[NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] NCPH day 0 ICANN86 / meeting with board

[farzaneh badii]

I think we should not do per sg. Whats the difference between that and
board meetings?
We should show them how we differ and where we differ.


Farzaneh

On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 7:03 PM Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC <
ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote:

>
> tempting to say, prompting ChatGPT to come up with such a perspective for
> NCPH :)
>
> more seriously, so the question here is do we agree to have a part where
> each group present their side or only having common positions which are
> fewer and not that clear cut.
>
> Rafik
>
> Le jeu. 21 mai 2026 à 07:44, Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> AI (from the NCPH perspective)
>>
>> Curious, how do they/we intend to come up with a whole-of NCPH
>> perspective on AI's impact on DNS?
>>
>> Remain blessed,
>> Tomslin
>>
>> On Mon, 18 May 2026, 13:42 Rafik Dammak via NCSG-PC, <
>> ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> For day 0 in ICANN87, CSG is suggesting :
>>>
>>> A. State of the DNS from the Commercial Stakeholders view
>>>
>>>
>>> 1. Accuracy of Registrant Data
>>>
>>> 2. Access to Registration Data
>>>
>>> 3. Registrar non-compliance with RDP
>>>
>>> 4. DNS Abuse
>>>
>>>
>>> B. State of the DNS for Non-Commercial Stakeholders Stakeholders view
>>>
>>>
>>> 1. [TBD]
>>>
>>> 2.
>>>
>>> 3.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> C. Future issues impacting the DNS (Jointly covered)
>>>
>>>
>>> 1. AI (from the NCPH perspective)
>>>
>>> 2. ICANN structural review requirements
>>>
>>> 3. Government intervention
>>>
>>>
>>> Any comment on this?what we want to present  from our side ?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 14, 2026, 10:01 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> thanks Peter, taking notes of your suggestion.
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le mer. 13 mai 2026 à 13:48, Akinremi Peter Taiwo <
>>>> compsoftnet at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, Rafik,
>>>>>
>>>>> My suggestion would be to have something where we could look at an overview
>>>>> of NCPH's current and upcoming policy work, especially where board
>>>>> input or awareness would be valuable
>>>>>
>>>>> I recommend framing it as strengthening stakeholder balance rather
>>>>> than just matching CPH's engagement.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>> Peter
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 6:41 PM Rafik Dammak via NCSG-PC <
>>>>> ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any comments on this?
>>>>>> If not, I will share my response with CSG.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le ven. 8 mai 2026 à 19:09, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To secure the regular day 0 for NCPH prior to ICANN86, I submitted
>>>>>>> with John from CSG the request to Russ. It also included a request to meet
>>>>>>> with the board, something we couldn't secure before.
>>>>>>> So Russ is asking what we envision or request time with the board
>>>>>>> for in this case with CSG. They want to know in order to see if it fits
>>>>>>> their agenda during the board workshop
>>>>>>> Any suggestion will be helpful.
>>>>>>> For some context, one reason here is to have same level of
>>>>>>> engagement the board had with CPH in the contracted party summit just a few
>>>>>>> days ago.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>
>>>>> *Taiwo Peter Akinremi*
>>>>> ------ ------ -------  ------ ------ -------  ------ ------ ------- ------
>>>>> ------ -------  ------ ------
>>>>> *Phd Candidate | Principal & Executive Consultant, CSN*
>>>>> *Email:* compsoftnet at gmail.com, p-taiwo at compsoftnet.com.ng
>>>>> <peterexecute at gmail.com>
>>>>> ___________________________________________
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-EC mailing list
> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20260520/2356e6e1/attachment.htm>