[NCSG-PC] NCPH day 0 ICANN86 / meeting with board

[Rafik Dammak]

tempting to say, prompting ChatGPT to come up with such a perspective for
NCPH :)

more seriously, so the question here is do we agree to have a part where
each group present their side or only having common positions which are
fewer and not that clear cut.

Rafik

Le jeu. 21 mai 2026 à 07:44, Tomslin Samme-Nlar <mesumbeslin at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> AI (from the NCPH perspective)
>
> Curious, how do they/we intend to come up with a whole-of NCPH perspective
> on AI's impact on DNS?
>
> Remain blessed,
> Tomslin
>
> On Mon, 18 May 2026, 13:42 Rafik Dammak via NCSG-PC, <
> ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> For day 0 in ICANN87, CSG is suggesting :
>>
>> A. State of the DNS from the Commercial Stakeholders view
>>
>>
>> 1. Accuracy of Registrant Data
>>
>> 2. Access to Registration Data
>>
>> 3. Registrar non-compliance with RDP
>>
>> 4. DNS Abuse
>>
>>
>> B. State of the DNS for Non-Commercial Stakeholders Stakeholders view
>>
>>
>> 1. [TBD]
>>
>> 2.
>>
>> 3.
>>
>>
>>
>> C. Future issues impacting the DNS (Jointly covered)
>>
>>
>> 1. AI (from the NCPH perspective)
>>
>> 2. ICANN structural review requirements
>>
>> 3. Government intervention
>>
>>
>> Any comment on this?what we want to present  from our side ?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 14, 2026, 10:01 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> thanks Peter, taking notes of your suggestion.
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>>
>>> Le mer. 13 mai 2026 à 13:48, Akinremi Peter Taiwo <compsoftnet at gmail.com>
>>> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> Thanks, Rafik,
>>>>
>>>> My suggestion would be to have something where we could look at an overview
>>>> of NCPH's current and upcoming policy work, especially where board
>>>> input or awareness would be valuable
>>>>
>>>> I recommend framing it as strengthening stakeholder balance rather than
>>>> just matching CPH's engagement.
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 6:41 PM Rafik Dammak via NCSG-PC <
>>>> ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Any comments on this?
>>>>> If not, I will share my response with CSG.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>
>>>>> Le ven. 8 mai 2026 à 19:09, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To secure the regular day 0 for NCPH prior to ICANN86, I submitted
>>>>>> with John from CSG the request to Russ. It also included a request to meet
>>>>>> with the board, something we couldn't secure before.
>>>>>> So Russ is asking what we envision or request time with the board for
>>>>>> in this case with CSG. They want to know in order to see if it fits their
>>>>>> agenda during the board workshop
>>>>>> Any suggestion will be helpful.
>>>>>> For some context, one reason here is to have same level of engagement
>>>>>> the board had with CPH in the contracted party summit just a few days ago.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards
>>>>
>>>> *Taiwo Peter Akinremi*
>>>> ------ ------ -------  ------ ------ -------  ------ ------ ------- ------
>>>> ------ -------  ------ ------
>>>> *Phd Candidate | Principal & Executive Consultant, CSN*
>>>> *Email:* compsoftnet at gmail.com, p-taiwo at compsoftnet.com.ng
>>>> <peterexecute at gmail.com>
>>>> ___________________________________________
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20260521/68f9786d/attachment-0001.htm>