[NCSG-PC] Discussion with CSG leadership

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Farzaneh,

Thanks for those suggestions, I will share with them and see the reaction.

Best,

Rafik
Le lun. 27 juil. 2026 à 13:13, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Hi Rafik
>
> Sorry it took me some time. Yes we have concerns we cannot go as proposed
> and I don’t understand why PC doesn’t speak up!
>
> If we agree to propose this as is to the board it will come across as we
> are aligned on what the priorities are and obviously they are not aligned
> with us. To a board that is already either clueless about what the
> noncommercials priorities are or doesn’t really want to consider them.
>
> I suggest this:
>
> A. Policy developments
>
>    1. Registration data (accuracy, contactibility, access, privacy, and
>    transparency)
>    2. DNS Abuse implementation, safeguards, and registrant and end users
>    rights and access
>    3. Registrant remedies and due process
>    4. Human rights and privacy considerations in DNS policy across ICANN
>
> B. Strategic issues for the future of the DNS
>
>    1. AI and the future of Internet access, human rights in DNS policy
>    2. Government intervention, fragmentation, accessibility, and impacts
>    on the global DNS
>    3. Emerging challenges affecting Internet users and the
>    multistakeholder model
>
>
>
>
> Farzaneh
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 1:50 AM Rafik Dammak via NCSG-PC <
> ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is> wrote:
>
>> hi all,
>>
>> any concerns with the proposed topics listed below?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>>
>> Le sam. 18 juil. 2026 à 06:38, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I really need feedback about the topics other we will go with what is
>>> proposed.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2026, 13:18 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> a reminder, any feedback/input regarding the board meeting agenda in
>>>> day 0?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>> Le ven. 10 juil. 2026 à 08:05, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
>>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I had a call with Mason who is chairing CSG for this turn and we
>>>>> discussed Day 0 agenda and GNSO chair election.
>>>>>
>>>>> For day 0, we agreed on a meeting with the board , asking to be at the
>>>>> end of the day and to have a cocktail with them. In a more substantial
>>>>> matter, they asked our feedback about this draft agenda for the meeting
>>>>> with the board;
>>>>>
>>>>> A.  State of the DNS from the Non-Contract Parties' view
>>>>> 1. Accuracy of Registrant Data
>>>>> 2. Access to Registration Data
>>>>> 3. Registrar non-compliance with RDP
>>>>> 4. DNS Abuse
>>>>> B.  Future issues impacting the DNS
>>>>> 1. Artificial Intelligence (from the NCPH perspective)
>>>>> 2. ICANN structural review requirements
>>>>> 3. Government intervention
>>>>>
>>>>> I was clear that we are not necessarily supporting all those topics.
>>>>> They want us to present as NCPH but share the different views from each
>>>>> side. So the questions :
>>>>> - what we want to keep, what we want to drop from above
>>>>> - what we want to amend and change
>>>>> - what we want to add instead
>>>>> - what will be your idea for presenting those topics
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me know what you think and if you have any other suggestions for
>>>>> the day 0 agenda. I suggested we can shape the day to discuss the topics we
>>>>> want to share with the board and other admin topics like board seat 14.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regarding the second topic, for the GNSO chair election, CSG has a
>>>>> candidate and is asking if we can nominate and support him for
>>>>> election, knowing that CPH has 2 interested candidates. I made clear that
>>>>> nomination and voting are 2 separate matters.
>>>>>
>>>>> The proposed candidate is Vivek and I said that we will have an
>>>>> interview with him as we do like for any candidate. So we will schedule
>>>>> that in the coming days.
>>>>>
>>>>> On other hand, I brought concerns about the supposed "gentlemen
>>>>> agreement" for alternance between CPH and NCPH as NCSG was never part of it
>>>>> and neither got a NCSG chair. I want to discuss this with CSG and CPH as it
>>>>> should be changed and formalized.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me know your thoughts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20260729/69f8984b/attachment.htm>