[NCSG-PC] New Question by ICANN Board is very difficult and requires considerable research

[Kathy Kleiman]

A good answer!!

Tx Rafik,

Kathy

On 3/10/2025 10:36 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi Kathy,
>
> I responded quickly to what Dan shared, with this yesterday:
> "I think we can  try to cover the new question but not have a final 
> position. I would say we don't have capacity in particular for the 
> holistic review but the pilot already started, for the org review in 
> general but for other specific reviews we might need more discussion. 
> Also as it was discussed with ALAC today, there is concern about the 
> new operating standards and how scoping will happen."
>
> So I am thinking of responding:
> - NCSG needs more discussion to understand the impact and 
> implications. As a group we need to check about our own readiness.
> - with regards to operating standards and in relation to this 
> prioritization and planning exercise we have some concerns about 
> scoping and who will own it.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> Le mar. 11 mars 2025 à 13:47, Kathy Kleiman <Kathy at kathykleiman.com> a 
> écrit :
>
>     Hi All,
>
>     Pedro shared today that the ICANN Board asked us an additional
>     question about "Reviews."  I thought he meant the Board wanted to
>     discuss proposed changes to ICANN's Independent Review process --
>     in the currently-open public notice/, Proposed Updates to the
>     Operating Standards for Specific Reviews./
>
>     But this is something else-- a new and very difficult question
>     from the Board:
>
>     /==> If time permits, the Board is interested in hearing the
>     community’s views about bandwidth and priority across the work for
>     the Continuous Improvement Program, the Pilot Holistic Review, and
>     the upcoming ATRT4? If the community also has views about ATRT3's
>     suggestion as to scoping for ATRT4, e.g., to re-evaluate SSR and
>     RDS and thus set a course for future Specific Reviews, the Board
>     is interested in hearing these too"./
>
>     It seems strange for the Board to ask such a question without
>     adequate time to prepare.
>
>     *I certainly cannot answer this question without a lot of research
>     and thought.
>     *
>
>     *Does anyone else want to give it a shot?
>     *
>
>     Best regards, Kathy
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20250310/45a99280/attachment.htm>