[NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] NCSG sessions draft agendas

[Pedro de Perdigão Lana]

Hi Rafik,

Sorry for the delay, I was having a really rough time at work and was
working on urgency-only tasks that required a bit extra time, but I finally
got a lot of unfinished tasks out of the way this weekend and got up to
date with my ICANN obligations.

I think I briefly mentioned this in a call or in another email, but we had
some progress and are finishing the first draft of the NCSG Issue Forum -
it will be a "phase 2" of the work started in the Issue Forum in ICANN 81,
but this time centered in the concerns regarding back-end
registries/Registry Service Providers. The plan is to go around and ask
potential non-commercial applicants what are the questions they would have
when reading the handbook and getting RSPs in the session to interact with
them, once again establishing a dialogue with ICANN staff about the
non-financial assistance they want to integrate with the ASP. I'll have
more details and share a well-developed draft soon to collect input and
help from the non-commercial leadership!

I'd be glad to take the ASP lead, but I need to confirm that this isn't the
bilateral meeting that will conflict with an NCUC agenda - it's getting
late here and I can't find the emails about the GAC bilateral and the RSSAC
bilateral, maybe Andrea can help me with that, please?

Cordially,

*Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
Researcher
PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC BR <https://isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
<https://www.ncuc.org> & NCSG
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN),
YouthLACIGF <https://youthlacigf.lat/>, IODA <https://ioda.org.br/> and CC
Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>
This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
mistake, please reply informing it.


Em qui., 13 de fev. de 2025 às 05:10, Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC <
ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu:

> Hi all,
>
> some updates to share
> for CSG session, they shared those topics for our consideration:
>
>    - Providing NCPH input to ICANN CEO regarding ICANN priorities
>    - Further Day 0 event planning (perhaps for Muscat) for NCPH
>    - Regular quarterly house meetings
>    - WSIS + 20
>
> In addition we proposed  those: membership system follow-up, board seat
> 14, DNS abuse positions and plan. We will need to get board seat 14
> procedure finalized by Prague as the process will start by then.
> I think those are acceptable topics and linked to what we discussed
> previously with them
> Regarding DNS abuse they acknowledge that we have different views and ask
> how we can have productive discussion on the topic and move ahead.
> let me know if you agree with this list
>
> for GAC, as we discussed during the NCSG policy call, we can send to the
> GAC those 2 topics and finalize the agenda:    HRIA on DNS and gTLD
> Applicant Support
>
> any comment or question for the rest?
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
> Le ven. 7 févr. 2025 à 17:29, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am coordinating the agenda for the joint sessions with CPH, CSG, ALAC
>> and GAC, the current status is:
>> - Waiting for comments from CSG about the draft topics  we shared:
>> membership system follow-up, board seat 14, DNS abuse positions and plan.
>> They didn't propose anything yet from their side.
>> - I shared again those topics (HRIA on DNS abuse, applicant support, ethics
>> policy and community participant code, continuous improvement program) with ALAC
>> waiting for their comments and Jonathan asked about the INFERMAL report (
>> https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-webinar-to-discuss-infermal-a-project-focused-on-malicious-domain-registrations-05-02-2025-en
>> ). We might review and pick up some topics from the list.
>> - For CPH, they are discussing internally and we shared this initial
>> topic of HRIA on DNS Abuse. They didn't propose any topic from their
>> side yet.
>> - GAC proposed this based on back and forth discussion:
>> 1- Introduction of the NCSG and its work (5 mins)
>> 2- Discussion on (25 mins) :
>>     HRIA on DNS
>>     gTLD Applicant Support
>>     Public Interest Commitments (PICs)
>>
>> I have concerns about whether we can really cover ASP and PICs and how
>> much we can discuss about the latter. Please let me know your thoughts and
>> which we should pick up.
>>
>> - For SSAC, we cannot meet them this time but I agreed with SSAC chair
>> Ram Mohan to schedule it for Prague meeting. Andea will handle that on due
>> time.
>>
>> In the meantime, I want to confirm for those topics who can be the lead
>> for each. For HRIA on DNS abuse, I am assuming Farzaneh and Michaela can
>> handle that, for ASP that can be Pedro and Manju for continuous improvement.
>>
>> Regarding other NCSG sessions such as NCSG membership, I invited the new
>> policy head in ICANN but he cannot confirm yet and if we cannot meet him in
>> Seattle we will schedule a call with him later.
>> For the NCSG policy related meetings, @Tomslin Samme-Nlar
>> <mesumbeslin at gmail.com>  can share from his side. For the NCSG issue
>> forum, @Pedro de Perdigão Lana <pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com>  can you
>> share more about the selected topic and agenda?
>>
>> So please give me your input about the points above.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-EC mailing list
> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20250217/d4209e04/attachment.htm>