[NCSG-PC] [NCSG-EC] Fwd: [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] Action Items from ICANN82 Production call #1 and Doodle next call

Fri Nov 29 17:48:00 EET 2024

Hi,

I think my only real discomfort was that the community session on emerging
technologies seemed very superficial, and quite a few people commented on
this. We do need to be sure that the people who speak in those spaces are
real experts on the themes, to avoid delegitimizing these spaces.

Cordially,

*Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 <https://www.nic.br/>,  Pesquisador (GEDAI/UFPR
<https://www.gedai.com.br/>)
Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial (UCoimbra),
Coordenação/Diretoria/EC @ ISOC BR <https://isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
<https://www.ncuc.org> & NCSG
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN),
YouthLACIGF <https://youthlacigf.lat/>, IODA <https://ioda.org.br/> e CC
Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
Essa mensagem é restrita ao remetente e destinatário(s). Se recebida por
engano, favor responder informando o erro.

Em qui., 28 de nov. de 2024 às 02:11, farzaneh badii via NCSG-EC <
ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> escreveu:

> Thanks Rafik.
>
> It was a very well organized meeting and I appreciated the brewed tea
> instead of a terrible tea bag!
> I have to first thank Andrea for all the support for the HRIA session. She
> went above and beyond to provide us with our last minute requests.
>
> The geopolitical forum is always a monologue. I don't know why. so
> I support the suggestion to have a webinar before and just have Q&A but I
> also think we don't need Q&A we need issues that need to be addressed and
> give the community a chance to express it at the mic.
>
> For the community sessions, I don't know what we want to do with these
> cross community sessions but they are so time intensive that you have to
> attend all the organizing calls to be able to put the name of a
> noncommercial in. Also the topics, they were not very up to date I have to
> say. Can we invite some external experts as well to talk about
> geopolitics.They need a total revamp otherwise each session every meeting
> is going to have the same representative covering the same talking points.
>
> I liked the half an hour/an hour reception after each day in
> other meetings, it really allows us to hang out with other members of the
> community before we go to our receptions, dinners etc and we can have
> informal policy conversations. Is that something that we do only during
> Community or policy forum? If too hard to have a reception, maybe we can do
> networking breakfasts? They don't have to do the catering, I just think we
> can get more chances to talk to other community members.
>
> I didn't know they had switched the public forum to the morning and I
> missed it. Well my fault for not checking the agenda carefully but then the
> switch didn't make sense, it always made better sense to have it right
> before the Board AGM. But I don't know how others felt about it.
>
> This is again my bad, but our session on human rights and dns abuse was
> packed. So if we want to do some similar stuff we should specify a larger
> capacity.
>
> The transcription of this meeting was a bit off. Maybe I just paid more
> attention. Also I don't know if it's my ears or the equipment, but I
> sometimes had difficulty hearing people and others told me that audio
> quality has been poor in the rooms in recent ICANN meetings (so it's not
> venue related).
>
>
>
>
>
> Farzaneh
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 11:49 PM Rafik Dammak via NCSG-EC <
> ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Those are points from the ICANN planning meeting.
>> Any comment/feedback would be appreciated.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> From: Nathalie Peregrine via SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning <
>> soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org>
>> Date: Tue, Nov 26, 2024, 20:08
>> Subject: [SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning] Action Items from ICANN82
>> Production call #1 and Doodle next call
>> To: soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org <
>> soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org>
>>
>>
>>  Dear all,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you for attending the ICANN82 Production call held today on Monday
>> 25 November 2024. For those of you unable to attend, please find the
>> Zoom recording.
>> <https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/8T35m0TfR__yA7AMW6Gd6MTBWohYihNwuh8Z83xBpX26ti8jCGbAHS6O7ZXZgPjmMVTCXumEWsHn4mRi.JEDmOcygROqh-Pec?autoplay=true&startTime=1732557795000>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ⚠️ Please complete the Doodle poll for a next call next week:
>> https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/dGzny05b ⚠️
>>
>>
>>
>> *ICANN81 Feedback:*
>>
>> The feedback from ICANN81 was mainly positive. The venue location with
>> hotels close by, as well as restaurants and cafés, was appreciated. The
>> abundance of seating areas allowed for additional conversations. Having
>> food stalls available at the venue was extremely helpful. However, certain
>> room sizes and seating were deemed insufficient as several sessions were
>> held with standing room only given high attendance. The height of speaker
>> screens in the GAC room will need adjusting to avoid speaker discomfort.
>> The issue of session conflicts whilst improved upon, needs continued focus.
>> The suggestion was made to add a Zoom poll at the end of the Community
>> Session to gather immediate feedback.
>>
>>
>>
>> Here are the main items raised for consideration for ICANN82:
>>
>>
>>
>> *Areas needing improvement based on ICANN81 feedback:  *
>>
>>    1. room size information,
>>    2. speaker screen height,
>>    3. session conflicts,
>>    4. adding a Zoom poll to the end of the Community Session.
>>
>> These items have been duly noted as action items for staff support.
>>
>>
>>
>> *ICANN83 Block schedule:*
>>
>>    - The geopolitical forum is well attended, but lacking in interaction
>>    opportunities. The suggestion was made to hold the update section of the
>>    session during Prep Week, and a shorter, interactive section during the
>>    ICANN meeting. This would also free up a 90-min slot which will assist with
>>    SO/AC scheduling.
>>    - Most on the call were in favour of keeping the Community Session,
>>    but agreed that the topic decision would need to be made closer to the
>>    time.
>>    - The Q&A with the ICANN Executive team is a useful session,
>>    especially in the light of the new CEO coming onboard in the next few
>>    weeks. Sally will confirm the format of the community/CEO exchange with
>>    Kurtis and will come back to the group.
>>    - The joint ccNSO/ ICANN Board session will ideally take place on
>>    Tuesday or Wednesday, instead of the current slot on Thursday.
>>
>>
>>
>> If community leaders would be so kind as to socialize these points with
>> their members ahead of the call next week, this would be extremely helpful.
>> An updated Block Schedule will be circulated ahead of the call
>> incorporating the input received.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you all!
>>
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>>
>> Nathalie
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning mailing list --
>> soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning at icann.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> soac-leaders-icannmeeting-planning-leave at icann.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
>> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
>> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
>> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You
>> can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
>> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
>> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-EC mailing list
>> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-EC mailing list
> NCSG-EC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20241129/1b063267/attachment-0001.htm>