[NCSG-PC] Comments on the CCOICI survey
Johan Helsingius
julf at Julf.com
Tue Mar 12 12:02:19 EET 2024
Submitted last night. Thank you Stephanie and Manju!
Julf
On 11/03/2024 15:15, 陳曼茹 Manju Chen wrote:
> Thank you, Stephanie, for drafting the response!
>
> If no one have raised other opinions until 11 March 23:00UTC, can Julf
> please submit the response on behalf of NCSG?
>
>
> Thank you so much!!
>
>
> Best,
> Manju
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 19:03 Stephanie E Perrin
> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
> <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>> wrote:
>
> __
>
> Profuse apologies folks, did not realize I had restricted access.
> SHould now be open to anyone with the link, also attached as a word
> doc just in case. Copying Caleb and Juan and Ben in case they have
> comments. Deadline is tonight I think? If anyone has any great
> ideas on how we could have achieved consensus, I am all ears, but I
> could not think of anything except to keep trying. I do not
> recommend giving small teams or task forces the power to deprive
> Council of voting something down. And I could not see how we could
> not have separated out the work that we did reach agreement on, if
> we had had more notice of what the CPs were planning.
>
> cheers Stephanie
>
> On 2024-03-10 10:24 p.m., 陳曼茹 Manju Chen wrote:
>> Hi Spephanie,
>>
>> I can't assess the google doc, guess it'd be the same for others too.
>> Maybe if you could simply circulate the response in word document
>> and we can suggest edits (if any) in this mailing thread.
>>
>> Best,
>> Manju
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 3:33 AM Stephanie E Perrin
>> <stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca
>> <mailto:stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca>> wrote:
>>
>> I hope you are all happily home again after a safe and
>> relaxing trip,
>> luggage in tow. If not, my sympathies.
>>
>> Here is a google doc with my suggested comments on the survey.
>> Frankly,
>> while we are not happy with the outcome of the CCOICI, I
>> cannot see any
>> point in trying out a different structure. Maybe we can fix
>> the one we
>> have. Maybe we should have brought in ethics and COI experts
>> to help
>> the task force. We cannot consider changing the voting
>> procedure at
>> Council, we depend on the ability to object ourselves.
>> However, we need
>> to not repeat what happened, and we need to get back at fixing
>> the SOIs.
>>
>> Comments welcome, sorry for the delay but I had to go over the
>> meetings
>> and the root documents.
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KYB7RxmiYymxnyTxJ74ZOwG0EJ-N0GlwRrOEeiWvSwc/edit?usp=sharing <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KYB7RxmiYymxnyTxJ74ZOwG0EJ-N0GlwRrOEeiWvSwc/edit?usp=sharing>
>>
>> cheers Steph Perrin
>>
>> PS I am hopeless with google documents, hate them, so I wont
>> be offended
>> if you tell me I set it up all wrong. Hopefully you can make
>> suggestions
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>> <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
> <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list