[NCSG-PC] The question from the board for the Board/NCSG session

[Johan Helsingius]

Hi Kathy,

We don't have to respond in advance, so we have time to hash it out.

	Julf


On 06/03/2023 15:30, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
> Hi Julf,
> 
> This is an important question that bears discussion.  I think there are 
> differing thoughts even within our NCSG group.  Do we have to respond in 
> writing now?  Can we tell the ICANN Board that we are discussing F2F and 
> will share our discussion with them. This is not a quick question or an 
> easy one.
> 
> Question:  Isn't the NCSG meeting /before we meet with the ICANN Board? 
> /Can we put a slot in the agenda to talk about this matter?
> 
> Best and tx,
> 
> Kathy
> 
> On 3/5/2023 3:29 PM, Johan Helsingius wrote:
>> We still need to come up with a response to the question from the 
>> board: “The ICANN Board would like to explore how to combine the 
>> efficiencies of an agile approach to problem solving, like the 
>> Council’s small teams, with the need for accountability and 
>> transparency, to make progress on policy conversations. When would 
>> such an approach be most appropriate and how can we ensure that it 
>> does not circumvent required steps in a policy development process? ».
>>
>>     Julf
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc