[NCSG-PC] The question from the board for the Board/NCSG session

[Kathy Kleiman]

Hi Julf,

This is an important question that bears discussion.  I think there are 
differing thoughts even within our NCSG group.  Do we have to respond in 
writing now?  Can we tell the ICANN Board that we are discussing F2F and 
will share our discussion with them. This is not a quick question or an 
easy one.

Question:  Isn't the NCSG meeting /before we meet with the ICANN Board? 
/Can we put a slot in the agenda to talk about this matter?

Best and tx,

Kathy

On 3/5/2023 3:29 PM, Johan Helsingius wrote:
> We still need to come up with a response to the question from the 
> board: “The ICANN Board would like to explore how to combine the 
> efficiencies of an agile approach to problem solving, like the 
> Council’s small teams, with the need for accountability and 
> transparency, to make progress on policy conversations. When would 
> such an approach be most appropriate and how can we ensure that it 
> does not circumvent required steps in a policy development process? ».
>
>     Julf
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20230306/81c673aa/attachment.htm>