[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Request for Early Input - GNSO Transfer Policy Review PDP

[Juan Manuel Rojas]

Dear Julf and all, 
Those questions were the same were discussed on the last WG meeting. It is important to say that WG is now discussing about TEAC (Transfer Emergency Action Contact) and the call for input is to have the view from diverse opinions on this regard. In the meeting was made in survey mode. As far I understand this process is related to when the registrars need contact the registrant of a domain been transfered. 

My answer on the survey questions were:
1.Is additional data needed to support evaluation of the effectiveness of the TEAC mechanism?
As I said it was in survey mode inside Zoom room, there's no many information about the effectiveness of TEAC mechanism, so I answered YES. The next question is What data is needed? It wasn't on the survey what it was made, so here my answer is related to assess the mechanism, but I do not have more information
2. The time frame for registrants respond to communicatoins via TEAC channel, according with Status Quo said is 4 hours. So here my answer it was to let a window for at least 24 hours to respond. Here is important note that the time zone differences could be significant. And also the registrars will have to implement mechanisms to receive requests coming in other languagues than English. 

3. This question is similar to previous.

4. This question it was not on the survey made either. But I think about "Communications to a TEAC must be initiated in a timely manner". In order to being able to react if an small organization doesn't want to lose its domain I think a reasonable period of time would be a year later or let, at least, after renovation window (if apply) to use the dispute resolution process. 

 5. According to the survey this question is about the means of communication "the TEAC may be designated as a telephone number, and therefore some TEAC communications may take place by phone". Here my answer was directed that the contact should be made through e-mail also due to the fact that sometimes the phone is not enough to contact an organization or even their representative on this issues. 

Those were some of the question discussed on the last WG meeting, I think these answers can be helpful if anyone wants to add or amplify some of them. 

Best Regards,

JUAN MANUEL ROJAS P.
Director - MINKA DIGITAL ColombiaNPOC Policy Chair - NCSG/GNSO
Master IT candidate, UNAD
Registered Linux User No.533108.


Cel. +57 301 743 56 00
Instagram/Twitter: @JmanuRojas





                                                

    El martes, 28 de febrero de 2023, 03:34:43 p. m. GMT-5, Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com> escribió:  
 
 


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject:     Request for Early Input - GNSO Transfer Policy Review PDP
Date:     Tue, 28 Feb 2023 20:26:53 +0000
From:     Devan Reed <devan.reed at icann.org>
To:     julf at julf.com <julf at julf.com>, Andrea Glandon 
<andrea.glandon at icann.org>
CC:     gnso-secs at icann.org <gnso-secs at icann.org>, Emily Barabas 
<emily.barabas at icann.org>, Berry Cobb <Berry.Cobb at icann.org>, Julie 
Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>, Caitlin Tubergen 
<caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>



Dear Julf,

Please find attached a request from the GNSO Transfer Policy Review 
Policy Development Process Working Group forinputfrom your group on 
Group 2 topics within the PDP’s charter. Responses are requested by 4 
April 2023 and may be sent tognso-secs at icann.org 
<mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>.

Kind regards,

Devan

*Devan Reed*
Policy Development Support - TEMP
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

www.icann.org 
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.icann.org&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=5Q2VHFiILluU8bvJHD3YjtNb84SyquCx2HSNHYn1ybs&m=X5iO0FCI3T2FxZ0KhKQ1iY0GhPzLH7XaiK8LfLcHSPY&s=grheVbJRc-hQqrXXGzMqUK3Htr0S5Z74HFOhmrag-Js&e=>

cidimage001.png at 01D4E0C6.320C4B80
_______________________________________________
NCSG-PC mailing list
NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20230301/62f8aeab/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Transfer Policy Review PDP - Request for Early Input on Group 2 Topics .pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 184982 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20230301/62f8aeab/attachment.pdf>