[NCSG-PC] Topics for 1:1 with CEO

[Kathy Kleiman]

I would add Applicant Support.  We (in the/observing the Council SubPro 
Small Team Plus)  committee heard some very promising ideas last  week 
(11/27) from ICANN Org about ways to provide expanded assistance for New 
gTLD applicants qualifying for Applicant Support.

They are talking about a group of "Application Counselors" to assist 
qualifying applicants with their path towards preparing and submitting 
an application.  It is a plan that contains many of the ideas that 
Tomslin and I wrote up and shared in August/September :-).

*Perhaps a nice note of encouragement - thank you to Sally and ICANN Org 
for excellent work:  a 75 page report of how needy applicants are helped 
in other types of global systems AND very nice thinking and development 
of how we can apply these ideas in our own New gTLD application setting.*

We support the exploratory structure - and will offer thoughts, changes 
and improvement through appropriate channels (e.g., Reema and Namra are 
working on this in the Small Team Plus). /But all of the above is 
progress - good progress - and thank you!/

/ My two cents.
/

/Happy Holidays, Kathy
/


On 12/4/2023 4:59 PM, Tomslin Samme-Nlar wrote:
> Hi Julf,
>
> Some proposed topics:
>
> 1. Regarding the DNS abuse contractual amendment negotiations between 
> CPH and Org. What plans are there to consider the comments that came 
> through during the public comments period, including NCSG comments or 
> what will come out of that process?
>
> 2. Regarding the ICANN Board action on the final report of the 
> Cross-Community Working Group on new gTLD auction proceeds where the 
> board has determined that contrary to the CCWG recommendation, a bylaw 
> amendment is not necessary prior to the launch of the ICANN grant 
> program, and instead they could implement the recommendation that 
> ICANN grant applicants would not be afforded these remedies through 
> terms and conditions with the grant applicants. Do we have commitment 
> from the board and executive that the bylaw amendment will be done in 
> parallel to the grant program despite the bylaw amendment not being a 
> dependency for the launch of the grant program?
>
> Warmly,
> Tomslin
>
>
>
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 06:02, Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com> wrote:
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     Any issues you think I should bring up with Sally Costerton
>     in my 1:1 next week?
>
>             Julf
>     _______________________________________________
>     NCSG-PC mailing list
>     NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>     https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20231205/833da93e/attachment.htm>