[NCSG-PC] GNSO Council DNS abuse small team Questions

Kathy Kleiman Kathy at KathyKleiman.com
Mon Apr 11 17:11:12 EEST 2022


I support these questions and answers.

Best, Kathy

On 4/10/2022 7:34 PM, Tomslin Samme-Nlar wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> As you must have read from the update Wisdom shared a while back, some 
> questions were asked during an outreach by the small team and though 
> our community didn't provide any feedback to Wisdom's email, I think 
> it will be a good idea for us to provide some sort of official 
> response to those questions back to the small team.
> N.B: I went to observe the small teams meeting last week and realised 
> that all other SGs have or are planning to provide responses to those 
> questions.
>
> I have taken the liberty to draft 
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Hg468obYDwylFQ6q-3AX6m7UxZvNY1EXGpBFJ-WVd_0/edit?usp=sharing> 
> a few responses, which I hope you all can make changes to it as well 
> to better reflect our position on DNS abuse. The Google doc is here: 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Hg468obYDwylFQ6q-3AX6m7UxZvNY1EXGpBFJ-WVd_0/edit?usp=sharing
>
> The Questions again are:
>
> What specific problem(s) would policy development in particular be 
> expected to address and why do you believe that policy development is 
> the right mechanism to solve those problems?
>
>
> Proposed Response: The NCSG does not believe there are any problems 
> discussed in the community that require policy development effort. 
> Moreover, a common definition of DNS abuse which is in alignment with 
> ICANN’s bylaws and technical remit first needs to be adopted by the 
> community.
>
>
> What do you believe are the expected outcomes if policy development 
> would be undertaken, taking into account the remit of ICANN and more 
> specifically GNSO policy development in this context?
>
>
> Proposed Response: None, since we do not see any problem requiring 
> policy development.
>
>
> Do you (or your community group) have any expectations with regards to 
> possible next steps the GNSO Council could or should undertake in the 
> context of policy development?
>
>
> Proposed Response: Our expectation of next steps is for a common 
> community definition of DNS abuse which is in alignment with ICANN’s 
> bylaws and technical remit.
>
>
> Tomslin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20220411/2a6fbaf8/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list