[NCSG-PC] [NCSG-Discuss] RPMs Comment

[Liz Orembo]

The comments look good to me Rafik. Though I have to confess that I have
also not actively followed RPM as an observer.

There's a time it was proposed that we have topical webinars to update
members on where we are with the different WGs. Is this possible?

On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 7:57 PM Oreoluwa Somolu Lesi <oreoluwa at wtec.org.ng>
wrote:

> Ditto!!!
>
> Kind regards,
> Ore
>
>
> On 04/05/2020 5:28 pm, Tatiana Tropina wrote:
>
> Same as James. Looks fine but I haven’t followed RPM much.
> Cheers
> Tanya
>
> On Mon 4. May 2020 at 18:25, lists at icann.guru <lists at icann.guru>
> <lists at icann.guru> wrote:
>
>> ihavent been following RPMs enough to comment on the substance so fine by
>> me.
>>
>> *---*
>> *James Gannon*
>>
>> On 5/4/2020 5:14:34 PM, Olga Kyryliuk <olga_kyryliuk at ukr.net> wrote:
>> It looks quite comprehensive. Nohing to add from my side.
>>
>> Best,
>> Olga
>>
>>
>> *4 мая 2020, 16:30:43, от "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>> <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>:*
>>
>> For reminder, the deadline for submission is today.
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 4, 2020, 12:05 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> my first email sent to PC list was blocked because the size of the file.
>> we have a draft for review for the public comments on RPMs initial report.
>> while the document might look long , that is due to the formatting i.e.
>> google form but it is in fact shorter.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> De : *Michael Karanicolas* <mkaranicolas at gmail.com>
>> Date: ven. 1 mai 2020 à 23:50
>> Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] RPMs Comment
>> To: <NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As some of you may know, the RPMs Working Group has a comment period
>> which is currently open, and with a deadline of Monday noon for
>> submissions. Unfortunately,
>> the submission structure is not very user friendly - it's a long
>> Google form, rather than an open end call for responses, which makes
>> it tough to develop drafts.
>>
>> Nonetheless, a few NCSG participants in the working group were able to
>> put together the attached as a proposed NCSG response. If you have
>> feedback or comments, we'll ask that you provide it by Sunday at 1600
>> UTC, so we can have 24 hours to incorporate them into the final draft.
>>
>> Again, apologies for the short timeframe - the comment period itself
>> was relatively short, and the convoluted nature of the response
>> process led to challenges in putting this together. Still, I think
>> this is an important process for our constituency to engage with, and
>> hope we can put something in.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>
> --
> Oreoluwa Lesi
> Executive Director, Women's Technology Empowerment Centre (W.TEC)
> +234.803.621.1307, +234.813.339.9999 | www.wtec.org.ng
> <https://wtec.org.ng/> | @wteconline
> <https://www.instagram.com/wteconline/>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>


-- 

Best regards.
Liz.

PGP ID: 0x1F3488BF
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20200504/36333ba9/attachment.htm>