[NCSG-PC] [NCSG-Discuss] ICANN and the Public interest

Elsa S elsa.saade at gmail.com
Tue Oct 8 06:04:42 EEST 2019


Hi Rafik,

I’m a bit overworked this month unfortunately, but I would be happy to
review, suggest and comment on any doc that’s prepared by NCSG. May I
suggest that we take it on the list again and ask for urgent volunteers on
this? Maybe also extent the urgent email to the NCUC list too?

Warmly,

E.
—

On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 7:43 PM Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:

> hi all,
>
> the deadline for submission is 18th Oct, there is no volunteers in NCSG
> list and we shouldn't miss this opportunity.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> Le mer. 2 oct. 2019 à 08:28, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> bringing this topic to PC again as we need drafter and working the NCSG
>> response to the proposed framework.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> De : Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>> Date: mar. 24 sept. 2019 à 09:05
>> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] ICANN and the Public interest
>> To: NCSG <NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the details about public consultation below. I created a google doc so we
>> can start the drafting for a NCSG Comment
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nZJ91SSW55Isl2iBAEASopfYnWcsgsBcXdB5hUUjNdI/edit.
>> you can listen to webinar recordings  here
>> https://community.icann.org/display/prjxplrpublicint/GPI+Toolkit .
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> From 18 September – 18 October 2019, a community consultation is taking
>> place on the global public interest framework proposed by the ICANN
>> Board. In reviewing the proposal, the ICANN Board is asking the ICANN
>> community to consider the following questions for input to the ICANN Board:
>>
>> 1.  What are your thoughts on the proposed framework approach? Do you
>> have any suggestions for how it could be improved?
>>
>> 2.  What are your thoughts on the proposed approach for decisions in the
>> ICANN ecosystem to be accompanied by a consideration of their impact on the
>> global public interest (as well as an explanation regarding what is
>> meant by the GPI in the specific case)?
>>
>> 3.  How do you see this working for the Supporting Organization (SO),
>> Advisory Committee (AC), constituency, group, review team, or
>> cross-community working group (CCWG) to which you are contributing?
>>
>>
>>
>> The global public interest is central to many of ICANN’s primary
>> governance documents, and the ICANN Board hopes to play a role in
>> facilitating a bottom-up, community-driven process to develop a framework
>> as a toolkit for the ICANN community to consider the global public interest.
>> These considerations would not change the process by which decisions are
>> made but could instead serve as tools for the community to reinforce the
>> commitment to the public interest and to demonstrate how specific
>> recommendations, advice, and public comments are in the globalpublic interest.
>> This includes the ICANN community guiding the ICANN Board about the
>> public interest determination the latter must make in its decisions.
>>
>>
>>
>> To learn more about the framework, please read the discussion paper
>> [r20.rs6.net]
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__r20.rs6.net_tn.jsp-3Ff-3D0014631p6ECz1koeg6ajMSzZrFT7DO05069BKNDJvhNpKDU-2D38mdcxCqJ1EJzj5gscgfkGfGj-2DFGI3o7d-5FcGAxvEYcLuDt-2DuNbFw7pLtAPwsOOBVyljJ-5FnOUkAdXGEq-5Fpqhnx9MAz7aDEHi3hvOaYb3gqWjXDXghZrpf0Ca1iUZzXdnGBbim2ZY09p7WU0m-2DXOMIhpn2CTVR7lR4v-2DDeX-5F4RZFHV0Vx2gnIRwJwkZKqQoiglVM4l6PG-2Df7xB-5FIkXMVwTDMtu5FHvXFhlTLLJIN5Jg-3D-3D-26c-3Dz44JySTIvEGqNJPIjwWImwF59dG21I-2DoxnM1Mz6G5PmaucLg5GaW-5Fg-3D-3D-26ch-3DFcbT1z5bmkz6UEfk6eUJehq3ywPR-5FHTaxr7BzhY6q17TcrAkO831rw-3D-3D&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=Zrm2TmioSoHmD-RVsf08eb9s33A4I2k08_uP0LOo_zA&s=Y1oSQaaaH67cndtqhCcGryOkThAU0RpFNJVzZzD0mGc&e=>.
>> Community feedback is welcome by *Friday, 18 October 2019 via email at **gpitoolkit at icann.org
>> <gpitoolkit at icann.org>*. After the community consultation, there will be
>> a public session at ICANN66, followed by a Public Comment proceeding.
>>
>> Le mar. 24 sept. 2019 à 08:53, Elsa S <elsa.saade at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>>> Thanks for sharing Milton!
>>>
>>> ICANN seems adamant about using the terms on a context to context basis
>>> given the new proposed path forward, also shared in two webinars this month.
>>>
>>> Even though NCSG in the past year as far as I’ve seen, has been pushing
>>> for not using the word from the start, it seems we might have to actively
>>> work on mitigating the risk of its use in a more structurally biased way.
>>>
>>> I’m keeping an eye out for any developments on the consultation phase
>>> (even though I would have preferred a formal public comment phase instead),
>>> but would also invite that we all have a discussion about the proposed way
>>> forward by ICANN, more meticulously and collectively.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Elsa
>>>>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 5:59 PM Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I was reading some scholarly literature about public service
>>>> broadcasting and came across this statement from a GigaNet colleague, Yik
>>>> Chin:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> “The Constitution of the PRC indeed speaks the language of the Public
>>>> Interest (PI), and the term regularly appears in legal provisions without
>>>> definition. There have been no juridical interpretations of ‘PI’, either.
>>>> This ambiguity gives discretionary power to the authorities to interpret
>>>> ‘PI’ in ways that invade and deprive individuals of their rights. Chin, Y.C
>>>> 2012.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Food for thought
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dr. Milton L Mueller
>>>>
>>>> School of Public Policy
>>>>
>>>> Georgia Institute of Technology
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>>
>>> Elsa Saade
>>> Consultant
>>> Gulf Centre for Human Rights
>>> Twitter: @Elsa_Saade
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-- 
--

Elsa Saade
Consultant
Gulf Centre for Human Rights
Twitter: @Elsa_Saade
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20191007/42aee511/attachment.htm>


More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list