[NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] [Ext] Re: Action Item: Draft Response to Questions on the Independent Review Process Oversight Team (IRP-IOT)
Elsa S
elsa.saade at gmail.com
Mon Oct 7 15:09:15 EEST 2019
Thanks Ayden! I haven’t heard back from Flip or Keith on this yet, but I’m
definitely keeping an eye out for any developments!
E.
—
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 5:46 AM Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:
> Thank you for spotting this, Elsa. I have sent a brief statement of
> support to the Council list now. It is outrageous that they tried to insert
> such biased language.
>
> Ayden
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Friday, 4. October 2019 21:54, Elsa S <elsa.saade at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> This is happening, and I thought I would put it on your radar. For
> context, while the draft was being revisited I sent an email to the council
> (hoping for a discussion) saying that I would suggest that the
> organizations or entities that are listed for consultation should not have
> any conflict of interest in matters that come in relation to IRPs. Staff
> edited the draft and removed WIPO from the list along with one other org I
> believe.
>
> Following that, Flip sent this email to the council list accordingly. I
> would be happy to hear back from you about this if you have any thoughts.
>
> Best,
>
> Elsa
> —
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: *Drazek, Keith* <kdrazek at verisign.com>
> Date: Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 3:26 PM
> Subject: RE: [council] [Ext] Re: Action Item: Draft Response to Questions
> on the Independent Review Process Oversight Team (IRP-IOT)
> To: fpetillion at petillion.law <fpetillion at petillion.law>,
> julie.hedlund at icann.org <julie.hedlund at icann.org>, elsa.saade at gmail.com <
> elsa.saade at gmail.com>, council at gnso.icann.org <council at gnso.icann.org>
>
>
> Hi Flip,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your email. I did not realize that there was a disagreement
> within the drafting team (you and Elsa) on the point concerning the removal
> of WIPO, prior to her request to remove it, and the finalization of the
> comment. I will ask staff to set up a call among the leadership team and
> the two of you for next week so we can try to resolve this. Please watch
> for a doodle poll. We have also notified Samantha Eisner that we may need
> to retract the current statement and will provide her an update next week.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Keith
>
>
>
> *From:* council <council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> *On Behalf Of *Flip
> Petillion
> *Sent:* Friday, October 04, 2019 11:20 AM
> *To:* Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>; Elsa S <
> elsa.saade at gmail.com>; Council at gnso.icann.org
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [council] [Ext] Re: Action Item: Draft Response
> to Questions on the Independent Review Process Oversight Team (IRP-IOT)
>
>
>
> All:
>
>
>
> Thank you for reviewing the proposed text and for the feedback presented.
> However, I am compelled to formally object to the proposal to remove WIPO
> as an expert due to a conflict of interest. To my knowledge, this conflict
> has never been adequately explained or justified; nor has it been discussed
> (neither with nor without the involvement of the parties concerned).
>
>
>
> I had objected to this change before the text was submitted and that
> objection went unheeded. As we are a working group of 2 and there is an
> absence of consensus (in accordance with the GNSO Operating Procedures),
> the appropriate course of action is for Council to discuss and determine
> the disposition of the question.
>
>
>
> So far, I have only read a vague suggestion of ‘removing those
> [institutions] with conflict of interest given the nature of an IRP.’ This
> is a rather serious accusation that has no apparent basis (and yet has a
> material impact). I would therefore urge caution in removing a source
> that is clearly a world expert in this area. Compounding the matter, I am
> not aware of anyone following up on this suggestion at this point. No
> organisation was identified as having a ‘conflict of interest given the
> nature of an IRP.’ No explanation has been given as to the existence of an
> actual conflict of interest. Furthermore, it is unclear what was meant by
> ‘the nature of an IRP’ in this context?
>
>
>
> Therefore, I see no justification in removing a single dispute resolution
> provider like WIPO from the list of institutions that may be consulted with
> a view to preparing a standing panel. WIPO is an internationally-recognized
> institution which duly reports to its Member States (its annual Assemblies
> are in fact occurring this week), has neutrally and impartially operated
> the UDRP (covering 45,000 cases) for more than twenty (20) years now to the
> benefit of all ICANN stakeholders, which is trusted by over seventy-five
> (75) national registries for their policy and case expertise, and which has
> moreover led the way for ICANN in managing the LRO pre-delegation disputes
> process. Furthermore, I see no basis for ICANN staff to decide unilaterally
> to remove a provider from the list in a communication that is supposed to
> be prepared by the GNSO Council and for which I hold leadership
> responsibilities.
>
>
>
> In order to rectify this situation, I see two options:
>
>
>
> 1. We revert back to the original text and, if necessary, have council
> debate on the subject; or
> 2. The objection could be withdrawn.
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> Flip
>
>
>
> P.S.: That said, I would suggest an additional change: that the GNSO
> Council consider removing the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) from the
> list, albeit for reasons unrelated to the subject above. To my knowledge,
> ICANN has not previously engaged with the PCA. Asking them to assist now
> may seem inappropriate unless we can provide compelling reasons to the
> contrary. As far as I am aware, ICANN has not had any intention to rely on
> PCA’s services, nor has it such intention for the future. During the last
> council meeting, I did make this suggestion, but I am not aware of any
> subsequent actions.
>
>
>
>
>
> Flip Petillion
>
> fpetillion at petillion.law
>
> +32484652653
>
> www.petillion.law
>
>
>
> [image: signature_1434183782] <http://www.petillion.law/>
>
>
>
> Attorneys – Advocaten - Avocats
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *council <council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Julie
> Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
> *Date: *Tuesday, 1 October 2019 at 16:52
> *To: *Elsa S <elsa.saade at gmail.com>, "Council at gnso.icann.org" <
> council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [council] [Ext] Re: Action Item: Draft Response to
> Questions on the Independent Review Process Oversight Team (IRP-IOT)
>
>
>
> Dear Elsa and Councilors,
>
>
>
> As the deadline for comments ended yesterday, 30 September, and Elsa’s
> suggestion below is the only comment received, please see the attached
> final version of the response reflecting the minor change suggested by
> Elsa. This response will be delivered shortly.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Julie
>
>
>
> *From: *Elsa S <elsa.saade at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 9:12 AM
> *To: *Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
> *Cc: *"Council at gnso.icann.org" <council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: [council] Action Item: Draft Response to Questions
> on the Independent Review Process Oversight Team (IRP-IOT)
>
>
>
> Hi Julie,
>
>
>
> Thanks for resending this out! I just wanted to draw attention to the
> external expertise mentioned in the text, and would suggest removing those
> with conflict of interest given the nature of an IRP.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Elsa
>
> —
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 8:17 AM Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
> wrote:
>
> Dear Councilors,
>
>
>
> Per the action items below, please note in particular this one:
>
>
>
> *Item 11: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Draft Response to Questions on the
> Independent Review Process Oversight Team (IRP-IOT)*
>
>
>
> *Action items:*
>
> - *Councilors* to provide input by *30 September 2019*. *Small team* to
> address Councilors feedback, if applicable, and complete revised draft for
> sending to ICANN org.
>
>
>
> With respect to this item please review the attached draft response and
> provide input, if any, by *Monday, 30 September 2019* according to the
> actions.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Julie
>
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>
>
>
> *From: *council <council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Andrea
> Glandon <andrea.glandon at icann.org>
> *Date: *Tuesday, September 24, 2019 at 8:22 PM
> *To: *"Council at gnso.icann.org" <council at gnso.icann.org>
> *Cc: *"'gnso-secs at icann.org'" <gnso-secs at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[council] Action Items: GNSO Council meeting 19 September 2019
>
>
>
> Dear Councilors,
>
>
>
> Please find the action items, as stated during the meeting, from the GNSO
> Council call held on 19 September 2019.
>
>
>
> Please ensure your wiki logins are up to date as all Action Items have
> been assigned to councilors and/or staff and posted on the Action Item wiki
> page here
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_RgZlAg&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=3-hGIGNPG_MVccHXahT9lk8qFDbuDuo_wwbRzKZZQGg&s=do3fZzjIln0Jwcx8qKogeUnOo6PFhu4TNs9Q0S7YzIs&e=>.
> If you are logged into the wiki when you go to that page, your name will be
> highlighted alongside the action item assigned to you. Please refer to this
> page for the recent status updates on the Action items.
>
>
>
> Please note that actions for all councilors are highlighted below.
>
>
>
> *ACTION ITEMS FROM THE GNSO COUNCIL MEETING 19 SEP 2019*
>
>
>
> *Item 2. Opening Remarks / Review of Projects & Action Items List*
>
>
>
> *Action Items:*
>
> - None
>
>
>
> *Item 3: Consent Agenda *
>
>
>
> *Action items:*
>
> - None
>
>
>
> *Item 4: COUNCIL DISCUSSION – ICANN Board referrals of CCT-RT
> recommendations to GNSO Council and GNSO PDP WGs*
>
>
>
> *Action items:*
>
> - *Councilors *to review and send comments, if applicable, by 26
> September 2019.
> - *Council leadership* to subsequently draft cover letter and send
> response to the ICANN Board, shortly thereafter.
>
>
>
> *Item 5: COUNCIL DISCUSSION – Discussion of the Inter-Registrar Transfer
> Policy (IRTP) Policy Status Report and Council next steps*
>
>
>
> *Action items:*
>
> - *Council* to convene a small focused drafting team (e.g., like the
> IDN Scoping Team) to review several items, including at least the review of
> the ICANN Policy Status Report, considering the possibility of policy
> development mechanisms, and the form of authorization (FOA) issues.
> - *ICANN Staff *to circulate call for volunteers to form small
> drafting team.
>
>
>
> *Item 6: COUNCIL DISCUSSION – Draft Amendments to the Review of All Rights
> Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs Charter to Integrate Recommendation 5
> From IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms Final Report*
>
>
>
> *Action items:*
>
> - *Small team* to address Councilors’ feedback (e.g., language about
> new recommendations superseding recommendations 1-4, ensuring technical
> expertise is available, and team composition) and deliver a revised draft
> by 27 September for Council review. After Council approval, send to the
> GAC/IGOs for their review.
>
>
>
> *Item 7: COUNCIL DISCUSSION – ICANN Org’s Request for Clarification on
> Data Accuracy and Phase-2 of the Expedited Policy Development Process
> (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data*
>
>
>
> *Action items:*
>
> - *Councilors* to provide input by *7 October 2019*. *Small team* to
> address Councilors’ feedback and complete revised draft for Council review
> and approval for sending to ICANN org.
>
>
>
> *Item 8: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - EPDP P1 Recommendation 27: ICANN Org’s
> Assessment of Impact From GDPR on Existing Policies / Procedures*
>
>
>
> *Action items:*
>
> - None
>
>
>
> *Item 9 - PDP 3.0 Small Group Update/Discussion*
>
>
>
> *Action items:*
>
> - *PDP 3.0* team to consider how input from outside the GNSO can be
> solicited.
>
>
>
> *Item 10: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Draft Response to the Verisign Request to
> Defer Enforcement of the Thick WHOIS Transition Policy*
>
>
>
> *Action items:*
>
> - *Council leadership* to send letter to ICANN Board.
>
>
>
> *Item 11: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Draft Response to Questions on the
> Independent Review Process Oversight Team (IRP-IOT)*
>
>
>
> *Action items:*
>
> - *Councilors* to provide input by *30 September 2019*. *Small team*
> to address Councilors feedback, if applicable, and complete revised draft
> for sending to ICANN org.
>
>
>
> *Item 12: ANY OTHER BUSINESS*
>
>
>
> *12.1 - **Draft GNSO Council letter* [gnso.icann.org]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_default_files_file_field-2Dfile-2Dattach_gnso-2Dcouncil-2Dto-2Dicann-2Dboard-2D13sep19-2Den.pdf&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=adDIs0WEx_lLwFfrsdovxTYY8GkRHo5ibc8SR3Npdh8&m=wzIcuBNsTyK_-aJaQlHE3GJd912842EagkY1lxr5Dys&s=i9lKVPogIFc9wMxzTAhK0c5W76B9uenIwV2XvbM6IUM&e=>*
> to the ICANN Board regarding potential dependencies between the Name
> Collisions Analysis Project (NCAP) and New gTLD Subsequent Procedures. *
>
>
>
> *Action items:*
>
> - *Council leadership* to send letter to ICANN Board.
>
> *12.2 - Approval of the 2019 slate of Members and Liaisons on the Customer
> Standing Committee (CSC) - possible email vote*
>
>
>
> *Action items:*
>
> - *None*
>
>
>
> *NEW: 12.3 - Invitation to Provide Feedback on the ICANN Board’s Proposed
> Public Interest Framework*
>
>
>
> *Action items:*
>
> - *Council* to convene a small drafting team to formulate a response
> to the public comment period.
> - *ICANN Staff *to circulate call for volunteers to form small
> drafting team.
>
>
>
> *Andrea Glandon*
>
> GNSO SO/AC Support
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
> *Email:* andrea.glandon at icann.org
>
> *Skype ID:* acglandon76
>
>
>
> Find out more about the GNSO by visiting: https://learn.icann.org/
> [learn.icann.org]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__learn.icann.org_&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=adDIs0WEx_lLwFfrsdovxTYY8GkRHo5ibc8SR3Npdh8&m=wzIcuBNsTyK_-aJaQlHE3GJd912842EagkY1lxr5Dys&s=kf1KBrkjy3HBF5KYAke_olPEzshzODyedOSeT19RtlA&e=>
>
> Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO [twitter.com]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_ICANN-5FGNSO&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=jLNFXvpu9gNdUeHi-G6sjWNCF9w4_AwhzzUDFZy2elE&s=kWw4fQPNjw2lVKy1UjTxS2F0BmjEAzaDFWNmsYywbmE&e=>
>
> Transcripts and recordings of GNSO Working Group and Council events are
> located on the GNSO Master Calendar [gnso.icann.org]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_group-2Dactivities_calendar&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=jLNFXvpu9gNdUeHi-G6sjWNCF9w4_AwhzzUDFZy2elE&s=-L6chFfv0OperrXHHpTF722WnH3FZIutn4cS16IvpOg&e=>
>
> See All SO and AC events on the ICANN Global Calendar [features.icann.org]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__features.icann.org_calendar&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=jLNFXvpu9gNdUeHi-G6sjWNCF9w4_AwhzzUDFZy2elE&s=JIuCi8FdVCOcC7bOAMWYU065PkC8Q_asOphTPPe8jeQ&e=>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy
> [icann.org]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_policy&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=adDIs0WEx_lLwFfrsdovxTYY8GkRHo5ibc8SR3Npdh8&m=VuQBkBlMG1KsrVNDg59TVqHmNSZz9P8aatqCz72nklM&s=x5OUMJhndbHWh9-PqG55E8KK5C3Ehl7GFl6SXpo5fW4&e=>)
> and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos
> [icann.org]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_tos&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=adDIs0WEx_lLwFfrsdovxTYY8GkRHo5ibc8SR3Npdh8&m=VuQBkBlMG1KsrVNDg59TVqHmNSZz9P8aatqCz72nklM&s=h1BBbfjoieUnV0ND7UdLDaax9prDv8WYoFIaoJYR-1Q&e=>).
> You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
> --
>
> --
>
> Elsa Saade
> Consultant
>
> Gulf Centre for Human Rights
>
> Twitter: @Elsa_Saade
> --
> --
>
> Elsa Saade
> Consultant
> Gulf Centre for Human Rights
> Twitter: @Elsa_Saade
>
>
> --
--
Elsa Saade
Consultant
Gulf Centre for Human Rights
Twitter: @Elsa_Saade
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20191007/40bcd630/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 7393 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20191007/40bcd630/attachment.png>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list