[NCSG-PC] Fwd: [Urgent] NCSG Comment on Evolving ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi,

we will continue clean-up the document and try to be more concrete (more
actions oriented) in term of suggestions. also preparing for the
interaction with Brian next week based on that.

on another topic, I will advice everyone to listen to the recording of the
GNSO webinar that was holds on Monday and what WG leadership as concerns (
we might agree or not with their assessments)

Best,

Rafik
Le lun. 17 juin 2019 à 15:47, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Hi all,
> I read comments made by others, why don’t we just delete anything that is
> not ready to be submitted and submit the clean parts?
> Cheers,
> Tanya
>
> On Mon 17. Jun 2019 at 08:45, Stephanie Perrin <
> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>
>> That makes sense to me.  I am afraid that our comment does not exactly
>> convey our substantive concerns yet, or at least I cannot follow the
>> logic.  I don't see this as an opportunity to be expansive about the MS
>> mandate (i.e. like a manifesto) I see it as a forum for making concrete,
>> actionable suggestions with evidence of problems well described.
>>
>> cheers SP
>> On 2019-06-16 22:22, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> thanks for the edits.
>> I tried to clean-up the document and remove the unnecessary parts. it is
>> getting shape but I am not sure that is ready since some items on list have
>> no comments. They need to be filled.
>>
>> Reading Stephanie email about inviting Brian to NCSG session, I was
>> wondering about :
>> - reach staff about the comment , we will be late even after the deadline
>> extension, checking when they are planning to issue the summary report.
>> Depending of the date, we might have a "grace period" or not.
>> - using the comment to channel our concerns directly to Brian during NCSG
>> session in Marrakech and follow-up after in written form depending if we
>> can make it for the public comment. I think our focus should be the
>> substance , complaining about the process initiated by board to Brian
>> doesn't make sense IMHO since he was hired to do the work (and not
>> responsible for starting this)
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>> Le ven. 14 juin 2019 à 22:35, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com>
>> a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> I am now in transit and will try work on this in this evening or
>>> tomorrow.
>>> Cheers,
>>> Tanya
>>>
>>> On Fri 14. Jun 2019 at 15:25, Elsa S <elsa.saade at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I reviewed quickly but I’ll have to review it meticulously after
>>>> checking in with you folks. Generally, this looks like a human rights
>>>> report, not a public comment. I’m not sure if we should change the whole
>>>> format or keep it the way it is? (I am aware we don’t have much time
>>>> anymore - but if someone else is willing to work on it with me, I’d be
>>>> happy to do it).
>>>>
>>>> E.
>>>> —
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 4:52 AM Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> thanks Stephanie, yes everyone should jump in to tidy-up and resolve
>>>>> issues in the draft.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>
>>>>> Le ven. 14 juin 2019 à 09:56, Stephanie Perrin <
>>>>> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> I am trying to edit this, but it needs extensive revision in my
>>>>>> view.  Not clear where the tangents we are going off on are coming from....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please tune in folks.  This is important.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Steph
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2019-06-13 14:55, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> this is an urgent task for NCSG PC to review and prepare this draft
>>>>>> for submission. we are already late and we should make it by this week as
>>>>>> it is critical public comment.
>>>>>> tidying-up the document and proof-reading are needed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>>>>> De : Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>>>>> Date: mer. 12 juin 2019 à 18:19
>>>>>> Subject: [Urgent] NCSG Comment on Evolving ICANN’s Multistakeholder
>>>>>> Model
>>>>>> To: NCSG <NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> please find for review and comment the NCSG submission on  Evolving
>>>>>> ICANN’s Multistakeholder Model
>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pz4rYiUx3FDl7af_stZYfRig0rgqekbRGFAxwG748D4/edit
>>>>>> , prepared by a drafting team for your consideration and review.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Elsa Saade
>>>> Consultant
>>>> Gulf Centre for Human Rights
>>>> Twitter: @Elsa_Saade
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20190618/168fe00b/attachment.htm>