[NCSG-PC] [council] IRP IoT and IRP Standing Panel -- Please Review

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi all,

I got this response from Sam in relation to my question about possible
extension:

"The deadline had previously been moved from the beginning of May to May
15, but we would be happy to receive any inputs from the NCSG when they are
available.  Please submit to the publicly-archived email indicated and we
will include the NCSG’s inputs as we are continuing our analysis document."

so we have last change to weigh in the process and submit a comment to
respond to the questions.

Best,

Rafik

Le lun. 17 juin 2019 à 11:26, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Hi Stephanie,
>
> that is why I resent the reminder and communication from the council . it
> will be also discussed in Marrakech meeting.
> of course as it is not standard public comment, there is no indication of
> who is the right ICANN staff managing this (I assume it is legal counsel).
> I will reach Sam Eisner to check.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> Le sam. 15 juin 2019 à 23:46, Stephanie Perrin <
> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> a écrit :
>
>> GOran brought this up in our chat.  They want us to respond.  Beg for
>> more time if we must....
>>
>> cheers Steph
>> On 2019-06-12 19:12, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>
>> Hi Farzaneh,
>>
>> Thanks for the response.
>> I think we still have time respond. This is page where the consultation
>> was announced for the first time
>> https://www.icann.org/news/blog/independent-review-process-standing-panel-call-to-action
>> .
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019, 00:10 farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Rafik
>>>
>>> as far as I remember we had another member there but he was never active.
>>>
>>> Which questionnaire do you mean? Do you mean the one I attached here? Do
>>> we still have time for that?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Farzaneh
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 6:54 PM Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> We have 2 action items regarding IRP standing panel , starting with
>>>> adding more volunteers to the implementation oversight team (I think only
>>>> Robin is participating there) .
>>>> We still also have to give our  input and respond to the questionnaire.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>>> From: Drazek, Keith via council <council at gnso.icann.org>
>>>> Date: Wed, Jun 12, 2019, 23:49
>>>> Subject: [council] IRP IoT and IRP Standing Panel -- Please Review
>>>> To: Donna.Austin at team.neustar <Donna.Austin at team.neustar>
>>>> <Donna.Austin at team.neustar>, gbunton at tucows.com <gbunton at tucows.com>,
>>>> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>,
>>>> claudia.selli at intl.att.com <claudia.selli at intl.att.com>,
>>>> Brian at Winterfeldt.law <Brian at winterfeldt.law> <Brian at winterfeldt.law>,
>>>> wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>,
>>>> bruna.mrtns at gmail.com <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>, joankerr at fbsc.org <
>>>> joankerr at fbsc.org>
>>>> Cc: gnso-secs at icann.org <gnso-secs at icann.org>, council at gnso.icann.org <
>>>> council at gnso.icann.org>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hello GNSO Stakeholder Group and Constituency Chairs,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I hope this note finds you well as we rapidly approach ICANN 65.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In Marrakech, one of the topics we are likely to discuss and hear about
>>>> from the ICANN Board is the work of the Independent Review Process (IRP)
>>>> Implementation Oversight Team (IoT) and the need for the community to focus
>>>> on the appointment of an IRP Standing Panel.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Two distinct items will require GNSO and SG/C consideration: The first
>>>> is a need to repopulate the current IoT, which began with about 25 members
>>>> several years ago, but has dwindled in active participation. Second, the
>>>> ICANN community will be required to contribute to the discussions around
>>>> the appointment of members to a Standing Panel.  This is a critical bylaw
>>>> obligation and must be made a GNSO priority during the second half of 2019.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please include this topic in your agenda planning for Marrakech and for
>>>> future SG/C meetings, so the GNSO Council can be well-informed of your
>>>> respective views.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Keith
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> council mailing list
>>>> council at gnso.icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
>>>> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
>>>> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy)
>>>> and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos).
>>>> You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
>>>> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
>>>> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20190618/26619729/attachment.htm>