[NCSG-PC] Fwd: [NCSG-Discuss] [feedback requested] EPDP Phase 2 Input Document

[farzaneh badii]

Hi Ayden

I had mentioned the problem of just citing Article 6 in my other comment on
Google doc. But as I said I think it's ok to submit if Stephanie doesn't
see there is an issue.


On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 6:52 PM Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:

> I did not resolve the comments in the Google Doc by pressing the 'resolve'
> button, but I did respond to the comment offering a suggested path forward,
> i.e. refer broadly to Article 6 of the GDPR. Please let me know if this
> alternative language would work? But I agree it would be great to get all
> members of the EPDP team to look over this document to make sure its sound,
> so I hope others can review it as a matter of priority.
>
> Best wishes, Ayden
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Sunday, 7 July 2019 23:49, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> (Observer) I have commented on this draft. I don't see my comments
> responded to and resolved. Basically I think if Stephanie with her
> expertise in data protection doesn’t get the time to look at it to see if
> the answers that have invoked GDPR are correct, then we run the risk of
> having answered the questions invoking the wrong articles and providing the
> wrong rational. we can submit without answering those questions that invoke
> GDPR specific articles.  I think I have flagged them in the document but
> will have a look again.
>
> On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 12:11 PM Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have not endorsed the contents of this document because I was involved
>> in drafting it.
>>
>> But I hope other members of the Policy Committee can review it as a
>> matter of priority and advise if it can be submitted or not. The due date
>> is Monday, 8 July. Thanks.
>>
>> Best wishes, Ayden
>>
>>
>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> On Wednesday, 3 July 2019 23:45, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> this need a swift action from PC: review and endorsment by deadline
>> (which was already extended)
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> De : *Ayden Férdeline* <icann at ferdeline.com>
>> Date: jeu. 4 juil. 2019 à 07:43
>> Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] [feedback requested] EPDP Phase 2 Input Document
>> To: <NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>
>>
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> As you might be aware, the EPDP (the working group looking at how Whois
>> can be reformed to better safeguard privacy) has now commenced phase 2 of
>> its work.
>>
>> The NCSG has been invited to offer its input to help inform the EPDP
>> Team’s deliberations for phase 2 of its work, which will focus on 1) the
>> system for accessing personal information, 2) the Annex to the Temporary
>> Specification, and 3) issues deferred from phase 1.
>>
>> The NCSG's representatives to the EPDP have prepared a first draft to
>> this input document, and we welcome your input here. Please take a look at
>> the document here, and please let us know if you have any concerns,
>> questions, or suggested edits:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rK5gp2hjABl29lLMzdlqSR0jWIOSQa-Oc4R_nzrUmqo/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> Our deadline for submitting this to the EPDP team is Monday, 8 July, so
>> your prompt review would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your
>> understanding.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Ayden Férdeline
>> on behalf of the NCSG's representatives to the EPDP
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
> --
> Farzaneh
>
>
> --
Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20190708/9d460050/attachment.htm>