[NCSG-PC] Fwd: [NCSG-Discuss] [feedback requested] EPDP Phase 2 Input Document

Tatiana Tropina tatiana.tropina at gmail.com
Mon Jul 8 19:54:20 EEST 2019


Hi Ayden, Farzaneh, and all,
I will support the submission once Stephanie says it’s okay to submit. I
mean, this has my support once she says the document is ok.
Thanks to Ayden and Farzaneh and others so much for working on this.
Warm regards,
Tanya

On Mon 8. Jul 2019 at 18:43, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:

> Just a reminder that this is due today; please can PC members chime in on
> whether or not this may be submitted and propose edits (if necessary) ASAP.
> We won’t get another extension (this was originally due 21 June so it is
> our last chance to comment). Thanks.
>
> Ayden
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 02:12, Arsène Tungali <arsenebaguma at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I do not want to delay submission of this input document so would advise
> submitting if all our EPDP representatives (our subject matter experts) are
> happy with its content!
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 08 Jul 2019, at 00:52, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:
>
> I did not resolve the comments in the Google Doc by pressing the 'resolve'
> button, but I did respond to the comment offering a suggested path forward,
> i.e. refer broadly to Article 6 of the GDPR. Please let me know if this
> alternative language would work? But I agree it would be great to get all
> members of the EPDP team to look over this document to make sure its sound,
> so I hope others can review it as a matter of priority.
>
> Best wishes, Ayden
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Sunday, 7 July 2019 23:49, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> (Observer) I have commented on this draft. I don't see my comments
> responded to and resolved. Basically I think if Stephanie with her
> expertise in data protection doesn’t get the time to look at it to see if
> the answers that have invoked GDPR are correct, then we run the risk of
> having answered the questions invoking the wrong articles and providing the
> wrong rational. we can submit without answering those questions that invoke
> GDPR specific articles.  I think I have flagged them in the document but
> will have a look again.
>
> On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 12:11 PM Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have not endorsed the contents of this document because I was involved
>> in drafting it.
>>
>> But I hope other members of the Policy Committee can review it as a
>> matter of priority and advise if it can be submitted or not. The due date
>> is Monday, 8 July. Thanks.
>>
>> Best wishes, Ayden
>>
>>
>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> On Wednesday, 3 July 2019 23:45, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> this need a swift action from PC: review and endorsment by deadline
>> (which was already extended)
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> De : *Ayden Férdeline* <icann at ferdeline.com>
>> Date: jeu. 4 juil. 2019 à 07:43
>> Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] [feedback requested] EPDP Phase 2 Input Document
>> To: <NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>
>>
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> As you might be aware, the EPDP (the working group looking at how Whois
>> can be reformed to better safeguard privacy) has now commenced phase 2 of
>> its work.
>>
>> The NCSG has been invited to offer its input to help inform the EPDP
>> Team’s deliberations for phase 2 of its work, which will focus on 1) the
>> system for accessing personal information, 2) the Annex to the Temporary
>> Specification, and 3) issues deferred from phase 1.
>>
>> The NCSG's representatives to the EPDP have prepared a first draft to
>> this input document, and we welcome your input here. Please take a look at
>> the document here, and please let us know if you have any concerns,
>> questions, or suggested edits:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rK5gp2hjABl29lLMzdlqSR0jWIOSQa-Oc4R_nzrUmqo/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> Our deadline for submitting this to the EPDP team is Monday, 8 July, so
>> your prompt review would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your
>> understanding.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Ayden Férdeline
>> on behalf of the NCSG's representatives to the EPDP
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
> --
> Farzaneh
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20190708/c5a68ee8/attachment.htm>


More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list