[NCSG-PC] Meeting with the Board in Kobe

Stephanie Perrin stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca
Tue Jan 29 01:29:42 EET 2019


That is a great list of things Elsa, and I agree that is a very 
worrisome thought about the PDPs....sure they are not working, but 
ignoring dissidents is not the answer. Overlaps in constituencies in 
particular, given the love of ALAC, is a problem.

cheers SP

On 2019-01-28 13:39, Elsa S wrote:
> Hi Steph,
>
> During the council meeting, we also met with the Board and Cherine 
> mentioned board priorities which included evolving the 
> mutlistakeholder model based on the exercise they had done with the 
> community in previous meetings (if you remember our NCSG session, it 
> was very poorly attended and did not really touch upon the points we 
> should have touched upon if i remember correctly). When I asked for 
> elaboration he mentioned(as far as I remember and as far as my notes 
> go - please other councilors correct me if I'm wrong) (1) the need to 
> revisit the process by which a PDP develops, (2) Minorities and how 
> much weight they should have, (3) the culture of accountability and 
> (4) overlaps in Cs. I'm extremely curious as to how those discussions 
> developed because the four of them could very much affect our work and 
> structure going forward.
>
> I’d also like NCSG, NCUC and NPOC to pioneer the anti-harassment 
> efforts which the board have been discussing. Apparently there’s a new 
> board working group for anti-harassment which they annouced today 
> https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2019-01-28-en. So if we could 
> ask them where they are atthen (in Kobe), and what NCSG could do to 
> help, it would be great. Bruna and I (Kathy also helped!) are already 
> in close touch with Sarah Deutsch and have been trying to push for 
> more community engagement, which the board has been receptive to. They 
> recently asked us if any other individuals would be willing to join. 
> Any ideas from the team would be welcome!
>
> Maybe we could also ask about some financial issues? Ayden sent an 
> excellent detailed email concerning the public comment review of FY20 
> with some points that could be detrimental to NCSG. Including crop, 
> intersessional, fellowship related issues.
>
> Finally, +1 to Farzi’s comments and we could give a very concrete 
> example on IGO-INGO if it's not too confrontational to do so.
>
> Best,
>
> Elsa
> --
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 12:44 PM Stephanie Perrin 
> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca 
> <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>> wrote:
>
>     Fabulous Kathy, thanks for this....i will sneak that into the call
>     with goran.  Perhaps we could ask for a visit/briefing in our NCSG
>     meeting, which we need to develop an agenda for very soon.  3
>     hours, I think a half hour chat with whoever is working on this is
>     in order....I would note that it appears twice in the 5 year plan,
>     rather worrisome.
>
>     cheers Steph
>
>     On 2019-01-28 12:26, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
>>
>>     Hi Stephanie,
>>
>>     What is the Board doing in terms of defining the public
>>     interest?  Personally, I am not sure we need to define this term
>>     (or can), but it is my understanding that Board work is being
>>     done in this area, and NCSG should certainly be involved!
>>
>>     Questions on public interest include: what is the Board doing,
>>     who is leading the effort (e.g., is there a committee), and how
>>     can we participate in the structuring and discussion of this
>>     important issue?
>>
>>     Best, Kathy
>>
>>
>>     On 1/28/2019 12:13 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>>>
>>>     Do we care who we meet with in Kobe from the Board? what is our
>>>     agenda?
>>>
>>>     I seek your guidance....have to respond soon to nail down
>>>     participation.  Further, as I said on the last PC call, I have a
>>>     call with Goran on the 31st, if there is anything you want me to
>>>     bring up let me know.
>>>
>>>     cheers Steph
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>     NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is  <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>>>     https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     NCSG-PC mailing list
>>     NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is  <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>>     https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>     _______________________________________________
>     NCSG-PC mailing list
>     NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>     https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20190128/2f2b5025/attachment.htm>


More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list