[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Deadline Extended: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Initial Report - Public Comment
Kathy Kleiman
kathy at kathykleiman.com
Tue Sep 18 00:59:33 EEST 2018
Hi Bruna, Elsa, All,
The Subpro WG deadline is rapidly approaching (as you know!) I've added
a few more points to the draft comments (how could SubPro WG ask so many
open-ended questions?) We have much agreement in our comments, and they
are long and very substantial. There also appear to be a few points of
differences which would merit some discussion. The document also needs a
good edit from our great editors.
Better late than never, shall we meet (or did the meeting already take
place)?
Best, Kathy
On 8/26/2018 10:14 AM, Bruna Martins dos Santos wrote:
> Interested!
>
> Em sáb, 25 de ago de 2018 21:54, Elsa S <elsa.saade at gmail.com
> <mailto:elsa.saade at gmail.com>> escreveu:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Any chance we could meet this coming week to fix the document?
> I’ll touch base with Robin and maybe Kathy to see if they could
> join us to answer some of our questions on the doc. In the
> meantime, I’ll be reviewing the doc and seeing if we could add any
> further points.
>
> Let me know if interested! I can set up a google doc.
>
> E.
> —
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 7:27 PM Rafik Dammak
> <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Thanks Farzaneh, that is good for us.
> I touched base few days ago with Elsa and Bruna regarding the
> status of our draft and we are currently progressing. I think
> Kathy is also helping for the review and Robin will be
> consulted too.
> as reminder we organized few weeks ago a NCSG webinar
> (https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/NCSG+Webinars)
> on the report presented by Robin where she highlighted the
> most important and relevant topics for us, I advice everyone
> to listen to it. while the report is 300 pages (there are
> appendices etc), it can be easier to listen to the webinar and
> check the spreadsheet made by the WG with all the
> recommendations and questions organized by topic.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> Le ven. 24 août 2018 à 01:31, farzaneh badii
> <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com <mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>> a
> écrit :
>
> we got some time for this huge document to comment on. A
> big Phew.
>
> Farzaneh
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: *Emily Barabas*
>
>
> Dear Farzaneh,
>
> We are writing to let you know that the public comment
> period
> <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gtld-subsequent-procedures-initial-2018-07-03-en>
> for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Initial
> Report has been extended. Public comments will now be
> accepted through *26 September 2018*. Can you kindly
> assist in sharing this information with the relevant
> members of your group?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Cheryl Langdon-Orr and Jeff Neuman (WG Co-Chairs)
>
> *From: *Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine at icann.org
> <mailto:nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>>
> *Date: *Wednesday, 4 July 2018 at 04:50
> *To: *farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com
> <mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>>
> *Cc: *"jeff.neuman at comlaude.com
> <mailto:jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>"
> <jeff.neuman at comlaude.com
> <mailto:jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>>, Cheryl Langdon-Orr
> <langdonorr at gmail.com <mailto:langdonorr at gmail.com>>,
> Steve Chan <steve.chan at icann.org
> <mailto:steve.chan at icann.org>>, Julie Hedlund
> <julie.hedlund at icann.org
> <mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>>, Emily Barabas
> <emily.barabas at icann.org
> <mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org>>, Maryam Bakoshi
> <maryam.bakoshi at icann.org
> <mailto:maryam.bakoshi at icann.org>>, "gnso-secs at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>" <gnso-secs at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>>
> *Subject: *New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Initial
> Report - Public Comment
>
> Dear Farzaneh,
>
> We write to you as the Co-Chairs of the GNSO’s New gTLD
> Subsequent Procedures Working Group (WG), which is tasked
> with calling upon the community’s collective experiences
> from the 2012 New gTLD Program round to consider potential
> changes that may be needed to the existing 2007
> Introduction of New Generic Top-Level Domains policy
> recommendations and implementation. We are pleased to
> share that the Working Group has reached an important
> milestone by publishing its Initial Report for Public
> Comment [icann.org]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_public-2Dcomments_gtld-2Dsubsequent-2Dprocedures-2Dinitial-2D2018-2D07-2D03-2Den&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=4gYyCwhtEI98RlWT6m_3FasU_W94CPJVbYvXvdaDxws&s=TwT7TfmDQ6Na2XFI7TKEFTn4pi5z-7JSXypjqAP6rRE&e=>.
> We would like to strongly encourage you to review this
> report and provide feedback through public comment on the
> draft preliminary recommendations, options, and questions
> for community feedback. Your input is essential to the
> success of this PDP.
>
> *1. Background on the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG*
>
> The GNSO’s New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group
> (WG), which was chartered by the GNSO Council to conduct a
> Policy Development Process (PDP), is seeking to determine
> what, if any, changes may need to be made to the
> existing/Introduction of New Generic Top-Level Domains/
> [gnso.icann.org]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_issues_new-2Dgtlds_pdp-2Ddec05-2Dfr-2Dparta-2D08aug07.htm&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=4gYyCwhtEI98RlWT6m_3FasU_W94CPJVbYvXvdaDxws&s=fAYAOAlC7DqbvB0WyYMiIOXAkUC6kzqPgR62nsJhHCQ&e=>//policy
> recommendations from 8 August 2007 as well as the
> finalApplicant Guidebook [newgtlds.icann.org]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__newgtlds.icann.org_en_applicants_agb&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=4gYyCwhtEI98RlWT6m_3FasU_W94CPJVbYvXvdaDxws&s=iK3CVAc8mCe_CJRGZTBv2B_bDcoekw7F1Tg2uNLpbsI&e=>dated
> June 2012. As the original policy recommendations as
> adopted by the GNSO Council and ICANN Board have “been
> designed to produce systemized and ongoing mechanisms for
> applicants to propose new top-level domains,” those policy
> recommendations remain in place for subsequent rounds of
> the New gTLD Program unless the GNSO Council would decide
> to modify those policy recommendations via a policy
> development process. The PDP WG created 5 Work Tracks that
> are responsible for considering the subjects within its
> charter. The PDP WG sought community input through two
> community comment periods. The Working Group has produced
> its Initial Report, which includes material from the full
> Working Group and Work Tracks 1-4. Work Track 5, focused
> on Geographic Names at the Top-Level, was established
> later than the other Work Tracks and will produce a
> separate Initial Report.
>
> *2. Information about the Initial Report and the Public
> Comment*
>
> The objective of this Initial Report is to document the
> Working Group’s deliberations on charter issues and
> preliminary recommendations, potential options for
> recommendations, as well as specific questions for which
> the Working Group is seeking input. Given the large number
> of issues, and the thousands of hours spent on addressing
> the 2012 New gTLD Program and improvements that can be
> made to the program moving forward, unlike other Initial
> Reports, this one does not contain a “Statement of level
> of consensus for the recommendations presented in the
> Initial Report.” The Co-Chairs not only believed that it
> was premature to measure the level of consensus of the
> Working Group members of dozens of recommendations
> contained within the Initial Report, but that doing so
> could have the unintended consequence of locking Working
> Group members into positions of support or opposition
> prior to soliciting public comment from the community on
> those recommendations. To form such definitive positions
> at this early of a stage could have the adverse effect of
> being less open to modifications to those positions as a
> result of community input.
>
> In addition, though many of the preliminary
> recommendations were generally agreed to by members that
> participated in the different Work Tracks, support has not
> been assessed amongst the members of the overall Working
> Group. The Overall Working Group has not sought to form
> definitive positions on each of these issues at this
> stage. Therefore, any language in this report that
> suggests that the Working Group or any of its Work Tracks
> is making a recommendation should be read as merely a
> rough assessment by the Working Group Co-Chairs or Work
> Track leads.
>
> After a comprehensive review of public comments received
> on this report, the Working Group will deliberate further
> on the preliminary recommendations contained within the
> Initial Report. It is possible that as a result of the
> deliberations, there may be supplemental reports released
> by the Working Group seeking additional public comments.
> Once all of that is completed, the Co-Chairs will conduct
> any formal consensus call(s) at the plenary level, on all
> recommendations before the Working Group issues its Final
> Report.
>
> Thank you for your consideration of this request. We look
> forward to any comments and any input that you and the
> organization you Chair are able to provide to our WG.
> While we of course welcome input on any area of the
> report, we would like to stress that given the extensive
> number of topics and preliminary outcomes, you should not
> feel compelled to respond to every single preliminary
> recommendation, option, and question. If possible, please
> submit your comments and input to us by 5 September 2018
> so that we may fully consider it in our further deliberations.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Cheryl Langdon-Orr and Jeff Neuman (WG Co-Chairs)
>
> Nathalie Peregrine
>
> Manager, Operations Support (GNSO)
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
> Email: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org
> <http://nathalie.peregrine@icann.org%20>
>
> Skype: nathalie.peregrine.icann
>
> Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive
> courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gnso.icann.org_files_gnso_presentations_policy-2Defforts.htm-23newcomers&d=DgMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=-d9m4sr16OXloyLjz4TF6npbe51hgE0EHtoX1U6WUOA&s=Bw2Uzbh2Pu1X0lObLtbwtN5ZNEP3ECdPAfcqzVvIOYE&e=>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
> --
> --
>
> Elsa Saade
> Consultant
> Gulf Centre for Human Rights
> Twitter: @Elsa_Saade
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180917/6a69c738/attachment.htm>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list