[NCSG-PC] latest letter, the response to the March 8 GDPR compliance model

[Stephanie Perrin]

I am really happy to delete that paragraph Milton, you have put your 
finger on the risk.  I will change it to a strong statement on model 
three being the only choice compliant with law until a professional, MS 
accreditation system (that contains audit and oversight) has been developed.

Cheers Stephanie

On 2018-03-11 05:46, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
> On the whole it is a very strong letter. I have one very strong 
> objection and would ask you to delete this paragraph:
>
> A small group of expert community members that can work with the GAC 
> might be a better way to come up with a tiered access system before 
> the law comes into effect.
>
> This is asking for trouble. Anything that happens in the next two 
> months is going to be sloppy and biased toward what GAC wants. As 
> Farzy suggested we should insist on them adopting model 3 until 
> tiering methods and criteria are worked out.
>
>
> Milton L Mueller
> Professor, School of Public Policy
> Georgia Institute of Technology
>
> On Mar 10, 2018, at 18:02, Stephanie Perrin 
> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca 
> <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>> wrote:
>
>> Ok folks, here is the letter as currently drafted.   COmments 
>> welcome.  Thanks to Ayden for many useful comments
>>
>> Stephanie
>>
>> <March 8 ICANN gdpr modelncsg4.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180311/795b1ad0/attachment.htm>