[NCSG-PC] Fw: Re: [Epdp-dt] Updated Draft Membership Structure

[Ayden Férdeline]

I forgot to forward this on to the PC yesterday; I also sent the below email to the drafting team. I think this is really important and I would appreciate backup on the Council list.

Many thanks, Ayden

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On 27 June 2018 11:23 PM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:

> Thank you for preparing this, Keith.
>
> I do not support other SO/ACs being able to appoint 3 members each. I prefer the original language that they only be permitted to appoint 1 member each (and 1 alternate).
>
> I remain concerned with the first bullet point, and prefer the original text that members be appointed by Stakeholder Groups. How each Stakeholder Group organises itself internally to appoint its own membership composition is its own prerogative.
>
> Similarly, in regards to bullet point # 9 on establishing consensus, I would like this to be revised from "SG/C" to "Stakeholder Group."
>
> In regards to bullet point # 12, please revise from, "The CPH must not be disadvantaged as a result during any assessment of consensus" to "Neither the CPH nor NCSG of the NCPH may be disadvantaged as a result during any assessment of consensus."
>
> Thank you again for working on this, Keith.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Ayden Férdeline
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On 27 June 2018 10:10 PM, Drazek, Keith via Epdp-dt <epdp-dt at icann.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Attached is my updated version of the membership structure (following this mornings discussion), and also some very preliminary proposed text for the eventual resolution.
>>
>> Please send comments!!
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Keith
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180628/13db18c2/attachment.htm>