[NCSG-PC] ePDP DT / Leadership Issues

[Ayden Férdeline]

I am okay with just a Chair. Maybe a vice chair too, though I worry that would result in a stakeholder imbalance and might even be unnecessary. Given how small the membership of the EPDP is likely to be, we do not want too large a leadership team - 1 co-chair per SG, and what’s the point of even having members? ;-)

I also think we should be firm that SO/ACs can only appoint 1 member.

Ayden

Sent from ProtonMail Mobile

On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 01:57, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> as we started the discussion at EPDP DT on different topics, I hope that we can coordinate our positions here.
>
> I don't have a strong preference in term of leardership composition but it shouldn't be itself big when we are trying to keep the EPDP team at small size. so 2 co-chair or chair and vice-chair is enough as they have to be from the team itself  and we shouldn't jeoprodize participation.  Selection by the team itself is fine. appointment by council has its own merit but I think that may lead to over-engineered solution and spending time in process (e.g. shall we delegate to SSC?).
>
> I expect that GNSO council leadership should be ex-officio there to keep up to date but not participating in discussion.
>
> please share your thoughts too.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> ps we will start soon our own process for appointing members while the work is going on membership requirements in the charter.
>
> From: council <council-bounces at gnso.icann.org> on behalf of "McGrady, Paul D." <PMcGrady at winston.com>
> Date: Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 16:14
> To: GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>
> Subject: [council] ePDP DT / Leadership Issues
>
> I think we have at least two questions to address:
>
> -  What is the ideal configuration of the leadership team for an EPDP?
>
> -  1 chair
> -  2 or more co-chairs
> -  1 chair and 1 or more vice-chairs
> -  Some other model
>
> -  Depending on the answer to the above, who should be nominated for leadership and what is that process?  Historically, WG’s select their own leadership and that is ratified by the Council.  Is that the same plan for the ePDP?
>
> Let’s discuss.
>
> PS: From the chat on today’s call I saw (and want to capture for your discussion):
>
> Ayden Ferdeline: Chair - Thomas Rickert
>
> Best,
>
> Paul
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. If this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author. Any tax advice contained in this email was not intended to be used, and cannot be used, by you (or any other taxpayer) to avoid penalties under applicable tax laws and regulations.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Epdp-dt mailing list
> Epdp-dt at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/epdp-dt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180619/243456be/attachment.htm>