[NCSG-PC] O.com comment

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi,

Bruna worked on some draft in the google doc
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1l9YFvDr_RGV0poMcqzdWFB2szGznV0orpIWyPuNVn-o/edit

I planned to ask for extension already for this week.

Best,

Rafik

Le lun. 18 juin 2018 à 23:38, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> I will go through it. I think we need an extension.
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:34 AM Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is this comment coming together, or should I draft one? I note the
>> deadline is in two days time...
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ayden
>>
>>
>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> On 10 June 2018 2:31 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ayden,
>>
>> thanks for raising this. it is quite an old issue and need to ask those
>> who were involved before 2007. On another hand, I think the similar issue
>> is the 2-letters characters and it is something that Farzaneh worked on and
>> followed closely. she may give us some guidance here.
>> for auctions, I don't think they are not intended to be for ICANN but for
>> non-profit organisations serving internet community (likely separate from
>> ICANN). the idea is worthy to be explored but my concern is that will
>> encourage ICANN to leave more of its responsibility and count on these
>> uncertain auctions to fund community activities.
>>
>> I think 0.com is still reserved as in the same process that reserved
>> other 1 character like o.com, so the security risk may raise later if
>> 0.com is requested to be removed from the reserved list.
>>
>> for NCSG draft comment, I think Bruna will submit one by this Monday.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> Le dim. 10 juin 2018 à 06:10, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> So I have been reading up on the allocation of single character gTLDs
>>> vis-a-vis this comment
>>> <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/o-com-single-char-2018-05-10-en>
>>> on the potential release of O.com. This issue has been brewing for some
>>> time, however I was wondering if the NCSG/NCUC/predecessor had released a
>>> comment on this issue. I could find a personal comment from Avri
>>> <https://forum.icann.org/lists/allocationmethods/msg00007.html> back in
>>> 2007 but not quite anything from us. Did we ever comment on this?
>>>
>>> Also, I was wondering our thoughts on where the money from the sale of
>>> O.com (and potentially other single character .coms) should go. I am
>>> opposed to this money going into the new gTLD Auction Proceeds fund, an
>>> idea I have seen floated around. I don't want to create a big burdensome
>>> programme here but I do think we should spend the funds on the ICANN
>>> community. CROP and ABRs are being cut, so perhaps these funds could be put
>>> aside to advance and sustain these community programmes in the future.
>>>
>>> Finally, could someone reasonably confuse O.com (letter 'o') with 0.com
>>> (number zero)? I think they could...
>>>
>>> Ayden
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
> --
> Farzaneh
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180618/17d54fd3/attachment.htm>