[NCSG-PC] Appointment of NCSG representative to PIR Advisory Council

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi,

Thanks Ayden for the draft, I made some comments there and tweaks. we can
finalize it this week if all PC members chime in and review asap.
with regard to the process, PC can work on drafting and document it then
the documentation will be subject to NCSG EC review, we don't need to have
wide consultation on this as by the charter.
yes, I can coordinate the process.

Best,

Rafik

ps after this we will come back to the discussion about PC procedures ,
that was in pause for months now.

Le mar. 12 juin 2018 à 05:30, Arsène Tungali <arsenebaguma at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> The procedures look great! These are to be followed thoroughly if there is
> enough time, i guess. I don’t know how long we have to submit the names to
> the PIR Board.
>
> And agree with the PC Chair to coordinate this process, if available.
>
> While waiting to know the timeline, are we soon sharing this document to
> the membership to receive inputs from them?
>
> -----------------
> Arsène Tungali,
> about.me/ArseneTungali
> +243 993810967
> GPG: 523644A0
> Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo
>
> Sent from my iPhone (excuse typos)
>
> On Jun 11, 2018, at 7:14 PM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:
>
> I would suggest Rafik, if he is willing and not going to run himself, as
> PC Chair.
>
> - Ayden
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On 11 June 2018 7:08 PM, Martin Pablo Silva Valent <
> mpsilvavalent at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ayden,
> The draft seems reasonable and efficient.
>
> Who would run the process? Since Farzi excluded herself since she is
> applying.
>
> Cheers,
> Martín
>
> On 11 Jun 2018, at 13:58, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have drafted a proposed procedure for determining our slate of
> candidates to send to the PIR Board. Here it is on Google Docs - please
> feel free to suggest revisions:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Iuw3Jt02Z6xZZBpOpUKWCNZjM_8k_uOSTc4IG3N_OTA/edit?usp=sharing
>
> —Ayden
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On 11 June 2018 1:03 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Farzaneh,
>
> Thanks for the note.
> I think we have several actions related to this appointement: tweak and
> adopt a procedure for appointment, outlining ceiteria and/or how to
> evaluate candidates, draft call for candidates . do we have an set date by
> when we have to send the recommendations to PIR? that will help us to set
> the timeline for this appointment.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
>
> Le lun. 11 juin 2018 à 05:44, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> All,
>>
>> It is time to issue a call for appointing an NCSG representative to the
>> Advisory Council of the PIR. I am representing NCSG currently. I will not
>> get involved with the process of issuing the call and assessing
>> applications since I will apply for the position.
>>
>> NCSG does not have a formal procedure for this appointment, so I suggest
>> using NCUC operating procedure to carry this out.
>>
>> Also note that PIR board has told us that NCSG should give them the slate
>> of candidates with a recommendation and then the board would nominate the
>> representative.
>>
>> Here is the procedure, you can replace NCUC EC with NCSG PC, note that
>> since the PC does not select the final candidate you just need to decide
>> the candidate you want to recommend to the board:
>>
>> 4. PIR Representative:
>> a. Had served in a leadership position within the NCSG or NCUC in the
>> past (former or current GNSO Councillors, Chairs of NCUC, EC members,
>> NCUC-appointees, PC members).
>> b. Can provide a recommendation letter from an experienced member who
>> understands the role of the PIR Advisory Council Representative.
>> c. Has contributed and initiated meaningful discussion on the NCUC or
>> NCSG mailing lists.
>> d. Has demonstrated knowledge of, or interest in the work of, the Public
>> Interest Registry, and is willing to be an active participant in Public
>> Interest Registry discussions and debates.
>>
>> C.Review and selection of candidates
>>
>> 1. NCUC EC will review all the candidates’ statements.
>>
>> 2. NCUC EC will evaluate each application based on qualifications.
>>
>> 3. Each NCUC EC member will provide justification as to why one candidate
>> is more qualified than other applicants. Candidates who are not selected
>> for the position shall be sent an email by the NCUC Chair informing them of
>> the EC’s decision. Upon request of the candidate(s), or where otherwise
>> appropriate, the Chair shall communicate to the applicant how they can
>> increase their chances of appointment in future rounds.
>>
>> 4. If the NCUC EC does not agree on a candidate, then a meeting shall be
>> arranged in due course to discuss and deliberate the candidates’
>> applications.
>>
>> 5. The deliberations about the candidates should be held confidentially
>> but the record should be kept by Chair may be provided.
>>
>> 6. The meeting will be held privately, but the notes, recording, and the
>> transcript should be kept for 2 years in case the EC decision is challenged.
>>
>> Best
>> Farzaneh
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180612/a3704b8d/attachment.htm>