[NCSG-PC] ICANN UAM consultation

[Ayden Férdeline]

Yes, I agree that we should provide input. This parallel process isn’t going away, but it will go ahead without our feedback.

Best wishes, Ayden

> On 28 Jul 2018, at 01:12, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We only discussed UAM in Panama as it was shared just prior to it, I think we got to pay more attention. Reading this blog post https://www.icann.org/news/blog/data-protection-privacy-update-key-gdpr-whois-updates-and-next-steps, ICANN org seems going ahead with the access model ignoring that the EPDP process was just initiated. I think it will be sensible to give input now. I expect there will be attempts to impose it at least as input for EPDP team.
> any thoughts?
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180728/75635e49/attachment.htm>