[NCSG-PC] Public Comment on Long Term options to adjust for Reviews timeline

[farzaneh badii]

Text is not missing. I just copy-pasted the text from ICANN document and
turned out to be weird which I will fix and try to finalize it more
assertively.

The staggering review is a very bad idea.  there is a risk that ICANN org
and Board will pick and choose. It does not allow more than two reviews
concurrently and if an organization or a group is really in need of being
reviewed it will be postponed and checks and balances against them wont be
in place. mind you that if reviews of a group is ongoing they are mindful
about their accountability. Like NomCom review became essential in changing
NomCom behavior.

I suggest adding timing criteria for the reasons I stated in the public
comment.

Best


Farzaneh


On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 9:11 AM Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com>
wrote:

> Hi All, Agree with Ayden that there is text missing from this comment --
> and it means that I (others?) don't (won't) understand what we are
> recommending.
>
> The following recommendation of ICANN.org, I think, makes sense:
> "Staggering the reviews to have no more than one Specific Review and two
> Organizational Reviews running concurrently."  Given two PDP Working
> Groups, one EPDP, and much more taking place in ICANN and the GNSO, I think
> this staggering makes sense and will help us in finding good people to join
> these reviews.
>
> Best, Kathy
>
> On 7/10/2018 5:18 AM, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>
> I think there is some text missing from this comment, but maybe it is my
> device (I am on a train and trying to view and edit Google Docs over its
> shaky, intermittent wifi is painful). I will try again later...
>
> Best wishes, Ayden
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On 9 July 2018 6:23 AM, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Here is another comment on long term options to adjust reviews timeline
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VItIeJMKjQMinu_IvJ1uJOvXSfTc_4U5ay_k7F6beOQ/edit
>
> We need to share with the mailing list soon. Deadline is 31 July.
>
> Best
>
>
> Farzaneh
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180710/b274a5ab/attachment.htm>