[NCSG-PC] Public Comments on Jurisdiction

[Ayden Férdeline]

Thanks for taking the lead on this, Farzaneh and Tanya. I have made some suggested edits to the document now; a mixture of stylistic and substantive. Hopefully I have not entered in any misinformation - if I have, please reject the edit of course, as I do not track this issue too closely. For that reason I have refrained from rewording the recommendation on the Choice of Law/Venue Provision. I was wondering if we would not take a stronger stance in favour of one of the report's proposals. I thought the 'menu approach' was quite a good one, certainly better than a California/fixed-law / status quo approach?

— Ayden

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [NCSG-PC] Public Comments on Jurisdiction
> Local Time: 3 January 2018 11:32 PM
> UTC Time: 3 January 2018 22:32
> From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com
> To: ncsg-pc <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>
>
> Tatiana and I drafted this public comment on jurisdiction which we will send  to the NCSG list shortly (by tomorrow). Here is our public comment response:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fb9lbDiOYTkKZRL9eE5A46sIl1btUtoAEZOCC3r5KVw/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Find the call here:[ https://www.icann.org/public-comments/recommendations-on-icann-jurisdiction-2017-11-14-en](https://www.icann.org/public-comments/recommendations-on-icann-jurisdiction-2017-11-14-en)
>
> The deadline is 14 January  It can remain on the mailing list for awhile ( I believe 2 days before the deadline) then we finalize it on PC list.
>
> We really need your collaboration for finalizing so please stay tuned and pay attention to our emails.
>
> Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180103/240350c2/attachment.htm>