[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Deadline Extended: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Initial Report - Public Comment

Sun Aug 26 17:14:23 EEST 2018

Interested!

Em sáb, 25 de ago de 2018 21:54, Elsa S <elsa.saade at gmail.com> escreveu:

> Hi all,
>
> Any chance we could meet this coming week to fix the document? I’ll touch
> base with Robin and maybe Kathy to see if they could join us to answer some
> of our questions on the doc. In the meantime, I’ll be reviewing the doc and
> seeing if we could add any further points.
>
> Let me know if interested! I can set up a google doc.
>
> E.
> —
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 7:27 PM Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Farzaneh, that is good for us.
>> I touched base few days ago with Elsa and Bruna regarding the status of
>> our draft and we are currently progressing.  I think Kathy is also helping
>> for the review and Robin will be consulted too.
>> as reminder we organized few weeks ago a NCSG webinar (
>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/NCSG+Webinars) on
>> the report presented by Robin where she highlighted the most important and
>> relevant topics for us, I advice everyone to listen to it. while the report
>> is 300 pages (there are appendices etc), it can be easier to listen to the
>> webinar and check the spreadsheet made by the WG with all the
>> recommendations and questions organized by topic.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> Le ven. 24 août 2018 à 01:31, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> a écrit :
>>
>>> we got some time for this huge document to comment on. A big Phew.
>>>
>>> Farzaneh
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>> From: Emily Barabas
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear Farzaneh,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We are writing to let you know that the public comment period
>>> <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gtld-subsequent-procedures-initial-2018-07-03-en>
>>> for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Initial Report has been
>>> extended. Public comments will now be accepted through *26 September
>>> 2018*. Can you kindly assist in sharing this information with the
>>> relevant members of your group?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Cheryl Langdon-Orr and Jeff Neuman (WG Co-Chairs)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From: *Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
>>> *Date: *Wednesday, 4 July 2018 at 04:50
>>> *To: *farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>>> *Cc: *"jeff.neuman at comlaude.com" <jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>, Cheryl
>>> Langdon-Orr <langdonorr at gmail.com>, Steve Chan <steve.chan at icann.org>,
>>> Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>, Emily Barabas <
>>> emily.barabas at icann.org>, Maryam Bakoshi <maryam.bakoshi at icann.org>, "
>>> gnso-secs at icann.org" <gnso-secs at icann.org>
>>> *Subject: *New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Initial Report -
>>> Public Comment
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear Farzaneh,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We write to you as the Co-Chairs of the GNSO’s New gTLD Subsequent
>>> Procedures Working Group (WG), which is tasked with calling upon the
>>> community’s collective experiences from the 2012 New gTLD Program round to
>>> consider potential changes that may be needed to the existing 2007
>>> Introduction of New Generic Top-Level Domains policy recommendations and
>>> implementation. We are pleased to share that the Working Group has reached
>>> an important milestone by publishing its Initial Report for Public
>>> Comment [icann.org]
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_public-2Dcomments_gtld-2Dsubsequent-2Dprocedures-2Dinitial-2D2018-2D07-2D03-2Den&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=4gYyCwhtEI98RlWT6m_3FasU_W94CPJVbYvXvdaDxws&s=TwT7TfmDQ6Na2XFI7TKEFTn4pi5z-7JSXypjqAP6rRE&e=>.
>>> We would like to strongly encourage you to review this report and provide
>>> feedback through public comment on the draft preliminary recommendations,
>>> options, and questions for community feedback. Your input is essential to
>>> the success of this PDP.
>>>
>>> *1.    Background on the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG*
>>>
>>> The GNSO’s New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group (WG), which was
>>> chartered by the GNSO Council to conduct a Policy Development Process
>>> (PDP), is seeking to determine what, if any, changes may need to be made to
>>> the existing *Introduction of New Generic Top-Level Domains*
>>> [gnso.icann.org]
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_issues_new-2Dgtlds_pdp-2Ddec05-2Dfr-2Dparta-2D08aug07.htm&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=4gYyCwhtEI98RlWT6m_3FasU_W94CPJVbYvXvdaDxws&s=fAYAOAlC7DqbvB0WyYMiIOXAkUC6kzqPgR62nsJhHCQ&e=> policy
>>> recommendations from 8 August 2007 as well as the final Applicant
>>> Guidebook [newgtlds.icann.org]
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__newgtlds.icann.org_en_applicants_agb&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=4gYyCwhtEI98RlWT6m_3FasU_W94CPJVbYvXvdaDxws&s=iK3CVAc8mCe_CJRGZTBv2B_bDcoekw7F1Tg2uNLpbsI&e=>
>>> dated June 2012. As the original policy recommendations as adopted by the
>>> GNSO Council and ICANN Board have “been designed to produce systemized and
>>> ongoing mechanisms for applicants to propose new top-level domains,” those
>>> policy recommendations remain in place for subsequent rounds of the New
>>> gTLD Program unless the GNSO Council would decide to modify those policy
>>> recommendations via a policy development process. The PDP WG created 5 Work
>>> Tracks that are responsible for considering the subjects within its
>>> charter. The PDP WG sought community input through two community comment
>>> periods. The Working Group has produced its Initial Report, which includes
>>> material from the full Working Group and Work Tracks 1-4. Work Track 5,
>>> focused on Geographic Names at the Top-Level, was established later than
>>> the other Work Tracks and will produce a separate Initial Report.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *2.    Information about the Initial Report and the Public Comment*
>>>
>>> The objective of this Initial Report is to document the Working Group’s
>>> deliberations on charter issues and preliminary recommendations, potential
>>> options for recommendations, as well as specific questions for which the
>>> Working Group is seeking input. Given the large number of issues, and the
>>> thousands of hours spent on addressing the 2012 New gTLD Program and
>>> improvements that can be made to the program moving forward, unlike other
>>> Initial Reports, this one does not contain a “Statement of level of
>>> consensus for the recommendations presented in the Initial Report.” The
>>> Co-Chairs not only believed that it was premature to measure the level of
>>> consensus of the Working Group members of dozens of recommendations
>>> contained within the Initial Report, but that doing so could have the
>>> unintended consequence of locking Working Group members into positions of
>>> support or opposition prior to soliciting public comment from the community
>>> on those recommendations. To form such definitive positions at this early
>>> of a stage could have the adverse effect of being less open to
>>> modifications to those positions as a result of community input.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> In addition, though many of the preliminary recommendations were
>>> generally agreed to by members that participated in the different Work
>>> Tracks, support has not been assessed amongst the members of the overall
>>> Working Group. The Overall Working Group has not sought to form definitive
>>> positions on each of these issues at this stage. Therefore, any language in
>>> this report that suggests that the Working Group or any of its Work Tracks
>>> is making a recommendation should be read as merely a rough assessment by
>>> the Working Group Co-Chairs or Work Track leads.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> After a comprehensive review of public comments received on this report,
>>> the Working Group will deliberate further on the preliminary
>>> recommendations contained within the Initial Report. It is possible that as
>>> a result of the deliberations, there may be supplemental reports released
>>> by the Working Group seeking additional public comments. Once all of that
>>> is completed, the Co-Chairs will conduct any formal consensus call(s) at
>>> the plenary level, on all recommendations before the Working Group issues
>>> its Final Report.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for your consideration of this request. We look forward to any
>>> comments and any input that you and the organization you Chair are able to
>>> provide to our WG. While we of course welcome input on any area of the
>>> report, we would like to stress that given the extensive number of topics
>>> and preliminary outcomes, you should not feel compelled to respond to every
>>> single preliminary recommendation, option, and question. If possible,
>>> please submit your comments and input to us by 5 September 2018 so that we
>>> may fully consider it in our further deliberations.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Cheryl Langdon-Orr and Jeff Neuman (WG Co-Chairs)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nathalie Peregrine
>>>
>>> Manager, Operations Support (GNSO)
>>>
>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>>
>>> Email: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org
>>> <http://nathalie.peregrine@icann.org%20>
>>>
>>> Skype: nathalie.peregrine.icann
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and
>>> visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gnso.icann.org_files_gnso_presentations_policy-2Defforts.htm-23newcomers&d=DgMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=-d9m4sr16OXloyLjz4TF6npbe51hgE0EHtoX1U6WUOA&s=Bw2Uzbh2Pu1X0lObLtbwtN5ZNEP3ECdPAfcqzVvIOYE&e=>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>
>> --
> --
>
> Elsa Saade
> Consultant
> Gulf Centre for Human Rights
> Twitter: @Elsa_Saade
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180826/0b7b1d72/attachment.htm>