[NCSG-PC] Public comments review - Urgent - decision to be made by Friday

[Martin Pablo Silva Valent]

I concur with Farzi’s view on Nr. 1, let’s move it forward. NCAP looks more than fine to me. Thanks to everyone that worked on it!

Cheers,
Martín

> On 20 Apr 2018, at 12:16, Juan Manuel Rojas via NCSG-PC <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I also support version 1 for Uniform Board because I think Farzi's point is an important point and should be raised. And I also support shorter version in NCAP. 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> JUAN MANUEL ROJAS P.
> Presidente - AGEIA DENSI Colombia
> Communications Committee Chair. Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) - ICANN
> Cluster Orinoco TIC member
> Master IT candidate, Universidad de los Andes
> 
> Cel. +57 3017435600
> Twitter: @JmanuRojas <http://www.twitter.com/jmanurojas>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                                                
> 
> 
> El viernes, 20 de abril de 2018 9:25:25 a. m. GMT-5, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escribió:
> 
> 
> Thanks for the responses, waiting for more to weigh in
> 
> Rafik
> 
> 2018-04-20 19:02 GMT+09:00 Poncelet Ileleji <pileleji at ymca.gm <mailto:pileleji at ymca.gm>>:
> +1
> 
> On 20 April 2018 at 07:54, Arsène Tungali <arsenebaguma at gmail.com <mailto:arsenebaguma at gmail.com>> wrote:
> I support version 1 for Board Screening because i also think Farzi is right and Version 2 for NC because it is short and straight to the point
> 
> -----------------
> Arsène Tungali,
> about.me/ArseneTungali <http://about.me/ArseneTungali>
> +243 993810967
> GPG: 523644A0
> Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo
> 
> Sent from my iPhone (excuse typos)
> 
> On Apr 20, 2018, at 7:32 AM, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com <mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>> Ill go for comment no.1 for the Board screening. The reason is that, if they have an international due diligence consultant why are we setting objectives for ICANN? The due diligence consultant can set those criteria and we can commet onit. I don't know about Name Collision. will go with whatever others suggest.
>> 
>> Farzaneh
>> 
>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 9:43 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> we need to make a quick decision regarding the 2 public comments as the extension is only until this week Friday.
>> 
>> For uniform board member screening, please weigh if you support version 1 or 2 to be submitted (attached)
>> for NCAP comment, I made a new short version supporting the proposed plan while expressing one concern regarding the cost of the studies (tried to capture the comments original draft). While we may have concerns about the structures to be used, I believe as this is really a technical project mandated to SSAC I don't think that must follow the usual model of open groups and representation (i.e representative from each SO/AC/SG/C) as there is required technical expertise and experience with the issue. 
>> 
>> the new version is here: https://docs.google.com/ document/d/1WVaunyKcFLRoiOL989 ZnrawRV0k4zG8L61hKBlxyZIg/edit # <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WVaunyKcFLRoiOL989ZnrawRV0k4zG8L61hKBlxyZIg/edit#>
>> the original version here: https://docs.google.com/ document/d/1jwK6ik8VgMjM26QUFc SmA0y9hBASmxMAGupnvvDSe2A/edit # <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jwK6ik8VgMjM26QUFcSmA0y9hBASmxMAGupnvvDSe2A/edit#>
>> please let me know which version which submit for board screening comment, and if you are fine with the new version for  NCAP to be submitted.
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Rafik
>> 
>> ______________________________ _________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/ listinfo/ncsg-pc <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
>> 
>> 
>> ______________________________ _________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/ listinfo/ncsg-pc <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
> 
> ______________________________ _________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/ listinfo/ncsg-pc <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Poncelet O. Ileleji MBCS
> Coordinator
> The Gambia YMCAs Computer Training Centre & Digital Studio
> MDI Road Kanifing South
> P. O. Box 421 Banjul
> The Gambia, West Africa
> Tel: (220) 4370240
> Fax:(220) 4390793
> Cell:(220) 9912508
> Skype: pons_utd
> www.ymca.gm <http://www.ymca.gm/>
> http://signaraglobalsolutions. com/ <http://signaraglobalsolutions.com/>
> http://jokkolabs.net/en/ <http://jokkolabs.net/en/>
> www.waigf.org <http://www.waigf.org/>
> www,insistglobal.com <http://www.itag.gm/>
> www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org/>
> http://www.wsa-mobile.org/ node/753 <http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753>
> www.diplointernetgovernance. org <http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________ _________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/ listinfo/ncsg-pc <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180420/b4cb5ea1/attachment.htm>