[NCSG-PC] Fw: [Gnso-sc-budget] [new draft] Comment on Reserve Fund Replenishment

[Rafik Dammak]

Thanks, Ayden for the explanation, happy to see that we are not supporting
touching the auctions funds at least.
as the comment is quite simple, I don't see any reason to not support it.

Best,

Rafik

2018-04-10 21:23 GMT+09:00 Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>:

> Hi Rafik,
>
> That is correct; we are remaining silent on alternatives, as it is
> unlikely that there is a common GNSO position on them. However we do think
> there is a common GNSO view that raising fees on the contracted parties
> would be the wrong approach. We all have different rationales as to why
> that would be so.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Ayden
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On 10 April 2018 1:17 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ayden,
>
> thanks for the work done on SCBO comment.
> I reviewed the previous version and fine with the latest one. so we are
> not exploring other options but only objecting to increasing fees? sorry I
> didn't join the SCBO confcall and didn't check yet the proceedings.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2018-04-10 2:35 GMT+09:00 Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Happy to get comments here from the PC re: the SCBO comment on reserve
>> fund replenishment. If you have any concerns, please raise them on our list
>> or with me directly. Thanks!
>>
>> Ayden
>>
>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> On 9 April 2018 5:14 PM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Thank you for joining our call today. Please find attached a revised
>> statement encompassing the requested edits. We are using the same Google
>> Doc
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UU-rQfCLjJ_mTNRN0EdA2b5zivJGUfbaHa6imRuKZIo/edit?usp=sharing>
>> as before.
>>
>> Could you please review this statement as a matter of priority, and
>> indicate if you have any concerns regarding the contents? The hope is to
>> submit this to the Council mailing list by Wednesday 11 April in order to
>> ascertain Councillor's comfort level with the text. The final date for
>> comment submissions on this issue is 25 April
>> <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/reserve-fund-replenishment-2018-03-06-en>
>> .
>>
>> Also - there is one unresolved edit, whether we would like the Reserve
>> Fund replenishment period to be "five or less years" (ICANN org proposal)
>> or "three to five years" (BC proposal). Can you please indicate if you have
>> a preference either way? Thanks.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Ayden Férdeline
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180410/01f3ef0a/attachment.htm>