[NCSG-PC] Response to IPC/BC model

Fri Apr 6 02:17:51 EEST 2018

Hi Stephanie, to what email address would you send this?

On 4/5/2018 7:03 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>
> The whole process is flawed, I think we should send it to the GDPR 
> address so that it is put on the web under community feedback on models.
>
> Stephanie
>
> On 2018-04-05 18:36, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
>>
>> It seems a little funny to send me to send a copy directly to 
>> winterfeldt law -- how about just the first email address?
>>
>> Also, perhaps we should publish our comment...
>>
>> Best, Kathy
>>
>>
>> On 4/5/2018 6:30 PM, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>>> They have asked that comments be sent to:
>>>
>>> stakeholders can provide written comments on the accreditation model 
>>> proposal to3amcomments at gmail.com <mailto:3amcomments at gmail.com>, 
>>> with a copy tointernet at winterfeldt.law 
>>> <mailto:internet at winterfeldt.law>.
>>>
>>>
>>> I hope all comments will be publicly published. Feels a little odd 
>>> simply sending this to a Gmail account.
>>>
>>> Ayden
>>>
>>>
>>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>>> On 6 April 2018 12:27 AM, Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Ayden, Good question. I think we should send it to Cherine and 
>>>> Goran and copy the email address in which Brian Winterfeldt and his 
>>>> law firm asked for "comments.'
>>>>
>>>> /I can't seem to find that email address right now -- would you 
>>>> happen to have it?/
>>>>
>>>> All on the PC, I'm downloading the document shortly for final check 
>>>> of the citations and formatting. Google doc does not make indented 
>>>> citations easy :-).  No more edits, please.  I'll have this over to 
>>>> Rafik and Farzi shortly.
>>>>
>>>> Best, Kathy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 4/5/2018 6:17 PM, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>>>>> I understand from the notifications from Google that changes are 
>>>>> being accepted, that work is still underway editing this document 
>>>>> and getting it into a submittable state. So I suppose now is the 
>>>>> time to ask, who are we sending this letter to? BC Chair and IPC 
>>>>> President, with Goran and Cherine in cc?
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Ayden
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>>>>> On 4 April 2018 4:09 AM, Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tx to Ayden for his excellent edits, now incorporated (with a few 
>>>>>> comments highlighting proposed rephrasing, Ayden). Tx also to 
>>>>>> Martin for his review!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Back to the PC to continue review...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best, Kathy
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 7:40 PM, Martin Pablo Silva Valent wrote:
>>>>>>> I am reading it now, but between Kathy and Ayden’s work, it 
>>>>>>> looks good to go. I’ll add my comments if any. So far, my full 
>>>>>>> support.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Martín
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 3 Apr 2018, at 20:38, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com 
>>>>>>>> <mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have reviewed the document now and put forward some suggested 
>>>>>>>> edits. Some are substantive changes but all are in the same 
>>>>>>>> spirit of the original text.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The formatting looks a bit odd; I hope the text alignments can 
>>>>>>>> be corrected prior to submission.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think the conclusion lacks punch; but can’t think of what it 
>>>>>>>> is missing at the moment...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ayden
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> P.S. Thanks to those who drafted it
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 01:24, Rafik Dammak 
>>>>>>>> <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Farzaneh,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> thanks for this.
>>>>>>>>> I would like to ask PC members to review it asap.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2018-04-04 6:57 GMT+09:00 farzaneh badii 
>>>>>>>>> <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com <mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Hi all
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Im on a plane so let me know if the link below is correct.
>>>>>>>>>     Kathy has written a response on ipc bc
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/16miuxuAYYgwUQHPde8N02W6G84oibuV9m4W3ZTeI_SA
>>>>>>>>>     <https://docs.google.com/document/d/16miuxuAYYgwUQHPde8N02W6G84oibuV9m4W3ZTeI_SA>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     We need to go through it asap and send it before their
>>>>>>>>>     meeting.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Please comment quickly and make sure you are on suggestion
>>>>>>>>>     mode (i set it that way not sure it went through)
>>>>>>>>>     -- 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Farzaneh
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>     NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>>>>>>>     NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>>>>>>>>>     https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>>>>>>     <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>>>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>>>>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180405/914b11e5/attachment.htm>