[NCSG-PC] Response to IPC/BC model

[Ayden Férdeline]

Hi,

I have reviewed the document now and put forward some suggested edits. Some are substantive changes but all are in the same spirit of the original text.

The formatting looks a bit odd; I hope the text alignments can be corrected prior to submission.

I think the conclusion lacks punch; but can’t think of what it is missing at the moment...

Best wishes,

Ayden

P.S. Thanks to those who drafted it

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 01:24, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Farzaneh,
>
> thanks for this.
> I would like to ask PC members to review it asap.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2018-04-04 6:57 GMT+09:00 farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> Im on a plane so let me know if the link below is correct. Kathy has written a response on ipc bc
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/16miuxuAYYgwUQHPde8N02W6G84oibuV9m4W3ZTeI_SA
>>
>> We need to go through it asap and send it before their meeting.
>>
>> Please comment quickly and make sure you are on suggestion mode (i set it that way not sure it went through) --
>>
>> Farzaneh
>> ______________________________ _________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180403/2a5882a6/attachment.htm>