[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Request for NSCG endorsement -- GNSO Liaison to the GAC

Sat Sep 9 16:02:34 EEST 2017

Find Krishna's application attached.

Farzaneh

On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 8:58 AM, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Krishna sent his application to the GNSO Sec directly and it was reverted
> to me and Tapani. I have to dig up his application.
>
> Farzaneh
>
> On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Stefi - the name I was given was Kris Seeburn, but I am not sure to
>> whom his application was sent.
>>
>> Best wishes, Ayden
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Request for NSCG endorsement -- GNSO Liaison
>> to the GAC
>> Local Time: 9 September 2017 1:47 PM
>> UTC Time: 9 September 2017 12:47
>> From: Stefania.Milan at EUI.eu
>> To: Tapani Tarvainen <ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info>, Ayden Férdeline <
>> icann at ferdeline.com>
>> ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>
>>
>> From having observed Julf from up close over these two years, he has my
>> total trust.
>> Who is the fourth candidate, Ayden?
>> But yeah, rethinking our strategy is a good suggestion, to streamline the
>> process and introduce clarity.
>> Stefania
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> Da: NCSG-PC <ncsg-pc-bounces at lists.ncsg.is> per conto di Ayden Férdeline
>> <icann at ferdeline.com>
>> Inviato: sabato 9 settembre 2017 14:37:25
>> A: Tapani Tarvainen
>> Cc: ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is
>> Oggetto: Re: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Request for NSCG endorsement -- GNSO Liaison
>> to the GAC
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It has been brought to my attention that there may have been a fourth
>> candidate for our endorsement. Rafik, are you able to confirm this? If true
>> - I am inclined to agree with Tapani that we might need to re-think our
>> strategy as to who we endorse...
>>
>> —Ayden
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Request for NSCG endorsement -- GNSO Liaison
>> to the GAC
>> Local Time: 9 September 2017 12:33 PM
>> UTC Time: 9 September 2017 11:33
>> From: ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info
>> To: ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I"m not sure we can put the candidates in order, but if we do, I would
>> also put Julf first. Among other reasons he"s the only one of them
>> with councillor experience.
>>
>> Second, I would not endorse Pascal. Even though the deadline given was
>> vague ("before Friday"), he did not follow the instructions but
>> submitted his application directly to the secretariat, and we didn"t
>> say we"d endorse everybody who asks - indeed we should not, but at
>> least try to consider the applications" substance, even though time is
>> short.
>>
>> I agree with Rafik that submitting more candidates is likely to lessen
>> our changes of getting any of them through, and looking at the
>> applications Pascal seems to me weakest of the three.
>>
>> Tapani
>>
>> (going offline for a week, so won"t be commenting on this any more)
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 01:04:25PM +0200, Dr. Tatiana Tropina (
>> t.tropina at mpicc.de) wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Ayden,
>> >
>> > thanks a lot. It seems that endorsing all three but proposing the
>> > preferred order is the best way.
>> >
>> > All: I personally would rather put Julf as number one, but I am fine
>> > with Ayden"s proposed order if everyone goes for this.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > Tanya
>> >
>> >
>> > On 09/09/17 12:58, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>> > > Hi Rafik,
>> > >
>> > > As we did not include a hard deadline in the email on Thursday, I
>> > > suppose Pascal did submit his request for endorsement on time [at
>> > > least by UTC timezone]. For that reason I support us endorsing his
>> > > application.
>> > >
>> > > However, if it would help the SSC in their deliberations, I would
>> > > propose that the preferred order of candidates from the NCSG be as
>> > > follows:
>> > >
>> > > 1. Paul Rosenzweig
>> > > 2. Julf Helsingius
>> > > 3. Pascal Bekono
>> > >
>> > > Best wishes, Ayden
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >> -------- Original Message --------
>> > >> Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Request for NSCG endorsement -- GNSO
>> > >> Liaison to the GAC
>> > >> Local Time: 8 September 2017 11:18 PM
>> > >> UTC Time: 8 September 2017 22:18
>> > >> From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>> > >> To: Dr. Tatiana Tropina <t.tropina at mpicc.de>
>> > >> ncsg-pc <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>
>> > >>
>> > >> Hi,
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks, I see we have support to send the 2 names as endorsed to SSC.
>> > >> We got an extra application lately and not sure that everyone has
>> > >> time to review it.
>> > >> there is no limit to send 3 names. however, I think that sending many
>> > >> names will weaken their chances of those candidatures at SSC
>> > >> deliberation since as Stakeholder group we are not championing
>> > >> clearly for one. that won"t make NCSG representatives to SSC easier
>> > >> either give them a clear guidance from their group.
>> > >>
>> > >> for now, I will send Julf and Paul applications by the deadline. if
>> > >> other PC members weigh in and also support sending Pascal application
>> > >> in coming hours, we can submit hs endorsment afterward.
>> > >>
>> > >> Best,
>> > >>
>> > >> Rafik
>> > >>
>> > >> 2017-09-09 3:04 GMT+09:00 Dr. Tatiana Tropina <t.tropina at mpicc.de
>> > >> <mailto:t.tropina at mpicc.de>>:
>> > >>
>> > >> Hi Rafik and all,
>> > >>
>> > >> I support.
>> > >>
>> > >> Cheers,
>> > >>
>> > >> Tanya
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On 08/09/17 14:28, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>> > >>> Hi,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> due to the time constraint and since we have 2 candidates, we
>> > >>> can endorse both and send their applications to SSC. if there is
>> > >>> no objection, I can submit them just before 23:59UTC.
>> > >>> looking to hear from other PC members.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Best,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Rafik
>> > >>>
>> > >>> 2017-09-08 16:50 GMT+09:00 Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com
>> > >>> <mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>>:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Hi,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I propose endorsing both. We are only asked, I believe, to
>> > >>> support their candidacies — we have not been delegated the
>> > >>> responsibility as PC of selecting the liaison.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Best wishes,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Ayden Férdeline
>> > >>> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 8:41 am, Arsène Tungali
>> > >>> <arsenebaguma at gmail.com <mailto:arsenebaguma at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >>>> So how are we doing this? Do we vote by a formal poll or
>> > >>>> are we just posting on here? ----------------- Arsène
>> > >>>> Tungali, about.me/ArseneTungali
>> > >>>> <http://about.me/ArseneTungali> +243 993810967
>> <+243%20993%20810%20967>
>> > >>>> <tel:+243%20993%20810%20967> GPG: 523644A0 Goma, Democratic
>> > >>>> Republic of Congo Sent from my iPhone (excuse typos) > On
>> > >>>> Sep 8, 2017, at 7:15 AM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote: > >
>> > >>>> Re-sending with the attachment. > > Tapani > > -----
>> > >>>> Forwarded message from Paul Rosenzweig ----- > > Dear
>> > >>>> Tapani (and Farzaneh as incoming Chair) > > I am writing to
>> > >>>> request that you consider endorsing me to be the GNSO >
>> > >>>> Liaison to the GAC. My current SOI is here: >
>> > >>>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Paul+Rosenzweig+SOI
>> > >>>> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Paul+Rosenzweig+SOI>
>> > >>>> > > My completed application template follows: > >
>> > >>>> APPLICATION TEMPLATE > > Name Paul Rosenzweig > Affiliation
>> > >>>> The Heritage Foundation/Red Branch > Consulting -- part of
>> > >>>> the NCSG > > Please provide an overview of your
>> > >>>> experience/expertise with GNSO policy > development
>> > >>>> processes: Since 2014, I have been an active > member of
>> > >>>> the CCWG-A in both WS1 and WS2 regarding accountability
>> > >>>> mechanisms > related to the ICANN transition. As such I
>> > >>>> have participated in the full > gamut of related GNSO/NCSG
>> > >>>> policy issue that are of applicability to that > context.
>> > >>>> Given my legal background, I have particularly focused on
>> > >>>> legal > issues -- viz, ICANN"s revised mission statement,
>> > >>>> the new Independent Review > Process, and ongoing
>> > >>>> considerations of jurisdictional issues. I have been, > and
>> > >>>> remain, especially focused on areas where the influence of
>> > >>>> the GAC seems > to reflect governmental interests that are
>> > >>>> inconsistent with GNSO policy. > > Please provide an
>> > >>>> overview of your Previous engagements in GNSO work in a >
>> > >>>> leadership capacity: I have not had a previous opportunity
>> > >>>> to serve in > the GNSO or NCSG in a leadership capacity.
>> > >>>> This is the first instance in > which I have volunteered
>> > >>>> for such a position. > > Please describe your familiarity
>> > >>>> with GAC processes, including GAC > engagement in GNSO
>> > >>>> policy development: As part of my work > with the CCWG-A I
>> > >>>> came to be intimately familiar with GAC processes for >
>> > >>>> engaging in GNSO policy development. I suspect that few in
>> > >>>> the GNSO have > paid quite as much attention as I have to
>> > >>>> the GAC"s rules of operation, its > definition of
>> > >>>> consensus, and the ways in which it is permitted to
>> > >>>> influence > ICANN policy. Indeed the changes to those
>> > >>>> processes were one of the > particular focuses of my
>> > >>>> interest in the CCWG-A and one of the reasons I was >
>> > >>>> skeptical of the ultimate product of the CCWG and the
>> > >>>> resulting changes to > ICANN"s methods for considering GAC
>> > >>>> advice. I remain of the view that GAC > engagement in GNSO
>> > >>>> policy development is essential but that it should be >
>> > >>>> accomplished through established GAC-GNSO liaison
>> > >>>> procedures and not through > extra-procedural fiat. By way
>> > >>>> of example, > I have been vocal in my view that the GAC"s
>> > >>>> intervention with the Board > regarding two letter second
>> > >>>> level top level domains was procedurally > improper (and
>> > >>>> also disappointed that the GNSO liaison to the GAC had not
>> > >>>> > alerted the GNSO to this issue earlier. [And, though
>> > >>>> neutrality is a > hallmark of a good liaison, I should also
>> > >>>> make clear that I find GAC claims > that second level
>> > >>>> two-letter domains should be restricted deeply >
>> > >>>> unpersuasive and antithetical to policies that animate the
>> > >>>> NCSG and the > GNSO]. > > Please provide any other
>> > >>>> information that demonstrates your qualifications > for
>> > >>>> this position: It is perhaps of relevance that I have a >
>> > >>>> history of service in the US government and thus a
>> > >>>> reasonable understanding > of the role of governments. In
>> > >>>> the 2005-09 time period I twice served as > the Acting
>> > >>>> Assistant Secretary for International Affairs at the
>> > >>>> Department > of Homeland Security, and thus experience in
>> > >>>> international diplomatic > contexts. I attach a full resume
>> > >>>> for your consideration. > > I would be happy to answer any
>> > >>>> further questions you or other members of the > NCSG might
>> > >>>> have. > > Regards > Paul > > Paul Rosenzweig > Red Branch
>> > >>>> Consulting, PLLC > 509 C St. NE > Washington, DC 20002 >
>> > >>>> paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
>> > >>>> <mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com> > O: +1
>> > >>>> (202) 547-0660 <tel:+1%20202-547-0660> > M: +1 (202)
>> > >>>> 329-9650 <tel:+1%20202-329-9650> > VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
>> <(202)%20738-1739>
>> > >>>> <tel:+1%20202-738-1739> > www.redbranchconsulting.com
>> > >>>> <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com> >
>> > >>>> www.paulrosenzweigesq.com
>> > >>>> <http://www.paulrosenzweigesq.com> > My PGP Key: >
>> > >>>> https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830
>> 097CA066684
>> > >>>> <https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A83
>> 0097CA066684>
>> > >>>> > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > >
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>>
>> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
>> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
>> material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution,
>> forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this
>> information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
>> prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received
>> this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the
>> material from any computer.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170909/13bb7615/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Resume-17-03-DSc-V2.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 120199 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170909/13bb7615/attachment.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GNSO Liaison to the GAC - call for candidates - KS.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 37888 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170909/13bb7615/attachment.doc>