[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Request for NSCG endorsement -- GNSO Liaison to the GAC

Sat Sep 9 14:04:51 EEST 2017

Thanks, Ayden. as we only discussed 2 candidates. in term of process, we
need some support to add a 3rd name for endorsement. so I would like to
urge other PC members to support this. if we agree on ranking, we can share
that to our reps in SSC for deliberations.

Best,

Rafik

2017-09-09 19:58 GMT+09:00 Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>:

> Hi Rafik,
>
> As we did not include a hard deadline in the email on Thursday, I suppose
> Pascal did submit his request for endorsement on time [at least by UTC
> timezone]. For that reason I support us endorsing his application.
>
> However, if it would help the SSC in their deliberations, I would propose
> that the preferred order of candidates from the NCSG be as follows:
>
>    1. Paul Rosenzweig
>    2. Julf Helsingius
>    3. Pascal Bekono
>
> Best wishes, Ayden
>
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Request for NSCG endorsement -- GNSO Liaison
> to the GAC
> Local Time: 8 September 2017 11:18 PM
> UTC Time: 8 September 2017 22:18
> From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com
> To: Dr. Tatiana Tropina <t.tropina at mpicc.de>
> ncsg-pc <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks, I see we have support to send the 2 names as endorsed to SSC.
> We got an extra application lately and not sure that everyone has time to
> review it.
> there is no limit to send 3 names. however, I think that sending many
> names will weaken their chances of those candidatures at SSC deliberation
> since as Stakeholder group we are not championing clearly for one. that
> won't make NCSG representatives to SSC easier either give them a clear
> guidance from their group.
>
> for now, I will send Julf and Paul applications by the deadline. if other
> PC members weigh in and also support sending Pascal application in coming
> hours, we can submit hs endorsment afterward.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2017-09-09 3:04 GMT+09:00 Dr. Tatiana Tropina <t.tropina at mpicc.de>:
>
>> Hi Rafik and all,
>>
>> I support.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Tanya
>>
>> On 08/09/17 14:28, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> due to the time constraint and since we have 2 candidates, we can endorse
>> both and send their applications to SSC. if there is no objection, I can
>> submit them just before 23:59UTC.
>> looking to hear from other PC members.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> 2017-09-08 16:50 GMT+09:00 Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I propose endorsing both. We are only asked, I believe, to support their
>>> candidacies — we have not been delegated the responsibility as PC of
>>> selecting the liaison.
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>>
>>> Ayden Férdeline
>>> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 8:41 am, Arsène Tungali <arsenebaguma at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> So how are we doing this? Do we vote by a formal poll or are we just
>>> posting on here? ----------------- Arsène Tungali,
>>> about.me/ArseneTungali +243 993810967 <+243%20993%20810%20967> GPG:
>>> 523644A0 Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo Sent from my iPhone (excuse
>>> typos) > On Sep 8, 2017, at 7:15 AM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote: > > Re-sending
>>> with the attachment. > > Tapani > > ----- Forwarded message from Paul
>>> Rosenzweig ----- > > Dear Tapani (and Farzaneh as incoming Chair) > > I am
>>> writing to request that you consider endorsing me to be the GNSO > Liaison
>>> to the GAC. My current SOI is here: > https://community.icann.org/di
>>> splay/gnsosoi/Paul+Rosenzweig+SOI > > My completed application template
>>> follows: > > APPLICATION TEMPLATE > > Name Paul Rosenzweig > Affiliation
>>> The Heritage Foundation/Red Branch > Consulting -- part of the NCSG > >
>>> Please provide an overview of your experience/expertise with GNSO policy >
>>> development processes: Since 2014, I have been an active > member of the
>>> CCWG-A in both WS1 and WS2 regarding accountability mechanisms > related to
>>> the ICANN transition. As such I have participated in the full > gamut of
>>> related GNSO/NCSG policy issue that are of applicability to that > context.
>>> Given my legal background, I have particularly focused on legal > issues --
>>> viz, ICANN's revised mission statement, the new Independent Review >
>>> Process, and ongoing considerations of jurisdictional issues. I have been,
>>> > and remain, especially focused on areas where the influence of the GAC
>>> seems > to reflect governmental interests that are inconsistent with GNSO
>>> policy. > > Please provide an overview of your Previous engagements in GNSO
>>> work in a > leadership capacity: I have not had a previous opportunity to
>>> serve in > the GNSO or NCSG in a leadership capacity. This is the first
>>> instance in > which I have volunteered for such a position. > > Please
>>> describe your familiarity with GAC processes, including GAC > engagement in
>>> GNSO policy development: As part of my work > with the CCWG-A I came to be
>>> intimately familiar with GAC processes for > engaging in GNSO policy
>>> development. I suspect that few in the GNSO have > paid quite as much
>>> attention as I have to the GAC's rules of operation, its > definition of
>>> consensus, and the ways in which it is permitted to influence > ICANN
>>> policy. Indeed the changes to those processes were one of the > particular
>>> focuses of my interest in the CCWG-A and one of the reasons I was >
>>> skeptical of the ultimate product of the CCWG and the resulting changes to
>>> > ICANN's methods for considering GAC advice. I remain of the view that GAC
>>> > engagement in GNSO policy development is essential but that it should be
>>> > accomplished through established GAC-GNSO liaison procedures and not
>>> through > extra-procedural fiat. By way of example, > I have been vocal in
>>> my view that the GAC's intervention with the Board > regarding two letter
>>> second level top level domains was procedurally > improper (and also
>>> disappointed that the GNSO liaison to the GAC had not > alerted the GNSO to
>>> this issue earlier. [And, though neutrality is a > hallmark of a good
>>> liaison, I should also make clear that I find GAC claims > that second
>>> level two-letter domains should be restricted deeply > unpersuasive and
>>> antithetical to policies that animate the NCSG and the > GNSO]. > > Please
>>> provide any other information that demonstrates your qualifications > for
>>> this position: It is perhaps of relevance that I have a > history of
>>> service in the US government and thus a reasonable understanding > of the
>>> role of governments. In the 2005-09 time period I twice served as > the
>>> Acting Assistant Secretary for International Affairs at the Department > of
>>> Homeland Security, and thus experience in international diplomatic >
>>> contexts. I attach a full resume for your consideration. > > I would be
>>> happy to answer any further questions you or other members of the > NCSG
>>> might have. > > Regards > Paul > > Paul Rosenzweig > Red Branch Consulting,
>>> PLLC > 509 C St. NE
>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=509+C+St.+NE+%3E+Washington,+DC+20002&entry=gmail&source=g>>
>>> Washington, DC 20002
>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=509+C+St.+NE+%3E+Washington,+DC+20002&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>> > paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com > O: +1 (202) 547-0660
>>> <+1%20202-547-0660> > M: +1 (202) 329-9650 <+1%20202-329-9650> > VOIP: +1
>>> (202) 738-1739 <+1%20202-738-1739> > www.redbranchconsulting.com >
>>> www.paulrosenzweigesq.com > My PGP Key: > https://keys.mailvelope.com/pk
>>> s/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684 > > > > ----- End forwarded
>>> message ----- > > _______________________________________________ >
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is >
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>> _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170909/67f05c3b/attachment.htm>