[NCSG-PC] [Draft] Letter to ICANN re: BC and IPC correspondence

[Rafik Dammak]

hi,

reminder for everyone to review the letter and share comments.

Best,

Rafik

2017-10-11 4:28 GMT+09:00 Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>:

> Also - I have now revised this letter again taking into account the
> helpful feedback that was received over the past 48 hours; moving forward,
> please feel free to edit the document directly if you have any changes
> you'd like to see made. Thanks!
>
> Ayden
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] [Draft] Letter to ICANN re: BC and IPC
> correspondence
> Local Time: 10 October 2017 7:44 PM
> UTC Time: 10 October 2017 18:44
> From: icann at ferdeline.com
> To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
> ncsg-pc <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>
>
> Hi Rafik,
>
> Thank you very much for your comments.
>
> It would be great if we could finalise this letter by Friday and perhaps
> even send it out that day. I very much welcome edits directly to the Google
> Doc; everyone on this list, please help write it and shape its contents!
>
> I would also like to propose that we write a monthly letter to ICANN on
> this topic until May 2018, when enforcement of the GDPR comes into effect.
> That way we can document for the data protection authorities that we have
> been informing ICANN in excess of six months of their need to comply with
> this regulation.
>
> The feedback from Nick Shorey on the PC call today - that we need to help
> engineer a conversation between the DPAs and their GAC representatives - is
> an interesting one, and one which seemed to have support in the chat. How
> would we go about this, however? Do we write to the GAC? Do we express this
> desire to them in Abu Dhabi during our face-to-face with them?
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Ayden
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] [Draft] Letter to ICANN re: BC and IPC
> correspondence
> Local Time: 10 October 2017 5:33 AM
> UTC Time: 10 October 2017 04:33
> From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com
> To: Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
> ncsg-pc <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>
>
> Hi Ayden,
>
> Thanks for the draft,
> it is important we make a point to voice our concerns and influence the
> process. as we discussed before here and on the last call we got 2 problems
> 1- our representatives in taskforce not being informed 2- the last Data
> protection conference (that is already passed)
>
> for the current letter, indeed we should tweak the language there ;) while
> we keep the substance. reading IPC letter, it seems they reject the use
> case matrix and I understood from previous comments you think that
> doesn't include our perspective. I add few comments but I think we can add
> more, in particular, our concerns in general regarding the process and not
> just responding to BC and IPC requests.
>
> I ask other PC members to review the letter and share their thoughts. I
> put the GDPR as a discussion item for today call. We need a deadline to get
> this done and prior to Abud Dhabi meeting if we may want to continue the
> discussion there and depending on how things go with the cross-community
> session. I propose that we reach a new version by this Friday.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2017-10-08 23:07 GMT+09:00 Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have drafted a letter to ICANN in response to the recent correspondence
>> received from the BC and the IPC. You can read/edit it here.
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/13ujYOpJFL0eNvjQCiNmsduFFbiUPQC5Wmbe9wHC2K6Q/edit?usp=sharing>
>> I know the language is provocative (intentionally so), but this is a first
>> draft -- and if you disapprove please provide alternative language.
>>
>> Best, Ayden
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20171013/4e9adb42/attachment.htm>