[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Community Travel Support questionnaire - consultation

[Arsène Tungali]

I do support this submission (the submission by NCSG)!
Thank you everyone for your contributions!

-----------------
Arsène Tungali,
about.me/ArseneTungali
+243 993810967
GPG: 523644A0
Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo

Sent from my iPhone (excuse typos)

> On Nov 18, 2017, at 9:22 PM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Martín,
> 
> Thank you for flagging this.
> 
> Following on from a message Tanya sent, I have just sent an email to the Council list suggesting the removal of the text that you commented on, suggesting that in its response, the Council simply remain silent on all capacity building programmes.
> 
> I hope this will be agreeable to all parties.
> 
> Best wishes, 
> 
> Ayden
> 
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Community Travel Support questionnaire - consultation
>> Local Time: 18 November 2017 3:47 PM
>> UTC Time: 18 November 2017 15:47
>> From: mpsilvavalent at gmail.com
>> To: Dr. Tatiana Tropina <t.tropina at mpicc.de>
>> Juan Manuel Rojas via NCSG-PC <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>
>> 
>> As I stated in Abu Dhabi, I share this concern since I started at ICANN and have been working on it since then, but I think the questions in the council should be first towards getting information so we can later come to a conclusion, it feels there is a prejudgment on wether the program is not fulfilling it’s mission or cost too much, or that we might just want something different as a community, but to get there we first need to understand it fully, if not, we are talking in the dark (which might be part of our conclusion, that we should have more info available to not have to ask basics).
>> 
>> I also understand Donna, that this might not need Council level to be discussed, specially at a stage of research and not actual community statement (that would require al SO to get behind a specific writing and maybe want to include other programs as well). 
>> 
>> So I do not support the current document unless it either reflects an informational concern rather than a prejudgment, and take sin account a lighter approach that would not make other SO oppose it. 
>> 
>> Of course, this is my opinion internally here, on the council I will support any decision the group makes as it is my duty and dynamic of work..
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Martín
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 18, 2017, at 8:08 AM, Dr. Tatiana Tropina <t.tropina at mpicc.de> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Likewise, this gets my endorsement. Thanks to all who weighed in and helped to shape the comment. 
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> Tanya 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 18/11/17 12:06, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>>>> I support its submission. Thank you.
>>>> 
>>>> —Ayden 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>>> Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: Community Travel Support questionnaire - consultation
>>>>> Local Time: 18 November 2017 11:04 AM
>>>>> UTC Time: 18 November 2017 11:04
>>>>> From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>>>> To: ncsg-pc <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> We have worked on this comment in the last days and shared with NCSG members. The deadline was supposedly yesterday and so I would like to get it endorsed in this weekend so we can submit it and ensure that our input is considered by staff. most of the changes were accepted or reworded.
>>>>> please share your support or not on the list asap.
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Rafik
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: 2017-11-16 23:52 GMT+09:00
>>>>> Subject: Community Travel Support questionnaire - consultation
>>>>> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>  hi all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> a few weeks ago, all SO/AC received a questionnaire from ICANN staff asking for input regarding the community travel support in order to update the travel guidelines. you can find more about the background on the attached paper.
>>>>> 
>>>>> In the last days, members of policy committee worked on responding to the questionnaire to ensure that NCSG participates in the consultation. Deadline for submission is the 17th November. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please find the draft comment for review here https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CNZrZ1OK9SL416h-lYuearVqDl_8grDsXLEKhwqQBHA/edit?ts=5a0d7129  
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Rafik
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20171118/c5c9fcfd/attachment.htm>