[NCSG-PC] [NCUC-DISCUSS] NCSG comments on the SO/AC Accountability recommendations
Matthew Shears
matthew at intpolicy.com
Fri May 26 19:47:41 EEST 2017
Based upon Ed's suggestion I have edited the doc to read as follows:
The NCSG recommends a change to the ICANN Bylaws at Sec 4.6 b, and
adding to documented procedures for Accountability and Transparency
reviews. For example, the following could be added to the Bylaws
§4.6(ii): (G) assessing and improving accountability procedures of the
Supporting Organisations and Advisory Committees. The specifics, such
as the recommendations in the report, could be left to lesser mechanisms.
Thoughts?
Matthew
On 26/05/2017 14:32, Matthew Shears wrote:
>
> This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to be. Learn about spoofing <http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing> Feedback <http://aka.ms/SafetyTipsFeedback>
>
> Hi Ed - elegant solution. I'm good with that.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On 26/05/2017 13:11, Edward Morris wrote:
>> Hi Matt,
>> Don't forget during WS2 Bylaw changes are fairly easy when they occur
>> as a result of a CCWG recommendation. If we want something in the
>> Bylaws linking SOAC accountability to the ATRT the time to do it is
>> now. If we want to be vague, something I agree with for the reasons
>> you mentioned, how about proposing:
>> Add to §4.6(ii) the following subsection:
>> (G) assessing and improving accountability procedures of the
>> Supporting Organisations and Advisory Committees.
>> The specifics, such as the recommendations in the report, could be
>> left to lesser mechanisms.
>> I do think it is important to get some mention in the Bylaws putting
>> SOAC accountability reviews within the remit of future ATRT's.
>> Ed
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From*: "Matthew Shears" <matthew at intpolicy.com>
>> *Sent*: Friday, May 26, 2017 1:13 PM
>> *To*: egmorris1 at toast.net, "ncsg-pc" <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>, "Rafik
>> Dammak" <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>> *Subject*: Re: [NCSG-PC] [NCUC-DISCUSS] NCSG comments on the SO/AC
>> Accountability recommendations
>>
>> Hi Ed
>>
>> I had wondered about this as well. I kind of left it vague because
>> while I totally agree with the sentiment I am just not sure about
>> incorporating the recommendations as a whole into the bylaws. If
>> they evolve/increase/decrease they will require an EC action
>> every-time. Could we add a line in the bylaws pointing to the
>> recommendations in the ATRT procedures and the broader issue of the
>> imperative of the SO/ACs working to strengthen their accountability,
>> etc.? Just not sure how it would be phrased.
>>
>> Best.
>>
>> On 26/05/2017 11:40, Edward Morris wrote:
>>> Hi Rafik,
>>> I support submission of these comments and thank those who have
>>> worked on the document.
>>> I would encourage the PC to consider changing the document a bit to
>>> support baking the SOAC "best practices" into the Bylaws as an
>>> addition to §4.6(b) rather than by adding them to the lesser (in
>>> terms of required adherence) ATRT procedures documentation. SOAC
>>> accountability is an essential and needed component of the overall
>>> ICANN accountability reforms and needs to be accorded the same
>>> weight as those accountability procedures applied to other parts of
>>> the ICANN ecosphere.
>>> Kind Regards,
>>> Ed
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> *From*: "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>> *Sent*: Friday, May 26, 2017 11:48 AM
>>> *To*: "ncsg-pc" <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>
>>> *Cc*: "Matthew Shears" <matthew at intpolicy.com>, "Marilia Maciel"
>>> <mariliamaciel at gmail.com>, "Milan, Stefania"
>>> <Stefania.Milan at eui.eu>, "Stephanie Perrin"
>>> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>, "Edward Morris"
>>> <egmorris1 at toast.net>, "Poncelet Ileleji" <pileleji at ymca.gm>,
>>> "Martin Pablo Silva Valent" <mpsilvavalent at gmail.com>, "Juan Manuel
>>> Rojas" <jumaropi at yahoo.com>, "Ayden Férdeline" <icann at ferdeline.com>
>>> *Subject*: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] NCSG comments on the SO/AC
>>> Accountability recommendations
>>> Hi,
>>> The deadline for submission is today. please review and send your vote.
>>> Best,
>>> Rafik
>>> 2017-05-25 22:50 GMT+09:00 Matthew Shears <matthew at intpolicy.com
>>> <mailto:matthew at intpolicy.com>>:
>>>
>>> Yes, final comments today, please. I will resolve in the AM.
>>>
>>> Matthew
>>>
>>> On 25/05/2017 14:36, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> this is a reminder to review the SO/AC accountability comment.
>>>> the deadline for submission is this Friday 26th May.
>>>> @Matt I assume that you can solve any comments in the document?
>>>> Best,
>>>> Rafik
>>>> 2017-05-23 8:40 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Matt,
>>>> thanks for drafting this. I think we can have Thursday as
>>>> deadline for getting all comments and doing edits in the
>>>> draft, in order for the policy committee to review and
>>>> endorse by Friday 26th May,
>>>> Best,
>>>> Rafik
>>>> 2017-05-22 18:31 GMT+09:00 Matthew Shears
>>>> <matthew at intpolicy.com <mailto:matthew at intpolicy.com>>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all
>>>>
>>>> Another consultation with a short deadline.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance for your inputs.
>>>>
>>>> Matthew
>>>>
>>>> On 19/05/2017 11:37, Matthew Shears wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>
>>>>> Another public comment - _due soon_: 26 May 2017 23:59 UTC
>>>>>
>>>>> Consultation page:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/soac-accountability-2017-04-14-en
>>>>> <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/soac-accountability-2017-04-14-en>
>>>>>
>>>>> Consultation document:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ccwg-acct-ws2-draft-recs-improve-soac-accountability-29mar17-en.pdf
>>>>> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ccwg-acct-ws2-draft-recs-improve-soac-accountability-29mar17-en.pdf>
>>>>>
>>>>> First draft of some initial comments here:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FQ25RT9DHqTIBFlDKXpLAUWIC0EqE54p0YdT_7ysCxA/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FQ25RT9DHqTIBFlDKXpLAUWIC0EqE54p0YdT_7ysCxA/edit?usp=sharing>
>>>>>
>>>>> Looking forward to your thoughts in the doc.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Matthew Shears matthew at intpolicy.com
>>>>> <mailto:matthew at intpolicy.com> +447712472987
>>>>> <tel:+44%207712%20472987> Skype:mshears
>>>>
>>>> -- Matthew Shears matthew at intpolicy.com
>>>> <mailto:matthew at intpolicy.com> +447712472987
>>>> <tel:+44%207712%20472987> Skype:mshears
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>> <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>>>> Virus-free. www.avg.com
>>>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> -- Matthew Shears matthew at intpolicy.com
>>> <mailto:matthew at intpolicy.com> +447712472987
>>> <tel:+44%207712%20472987> Skype:mshears
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>> --
>> Matthew Shears
>> matthew at intpolicy.com
>> +447712472987
>> Skype:mshears
>
> --
> Matthew Shears
> matthew at intpolicy.com
> +447712472987
> Skype:mshears
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
--
Matthew Shears
matthew at intpolicy.com
+447712472987
Skype:mshears
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170526/1842482f/attachment.htm>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list