[NCSG-PC] Reminder Comment on GNSO Community Comment 2 (CC2) on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Ed,

Thanks for the comment.
I can delete that line since it won't change the meaning of what precedes
it. I will wait for other members if they are fine with that change.

Best,

Rafik

2017-05-26 20:27 GMT+09:00 Edward Morris <egmorris1 at toast.net>:

> Hi Rafik,
>
> I've made a suggested edit (although have not removed the line, pending
> receipt of others views) in paragraph 7. Specifically calling for
> contractual compliance in the ICANN environment traditionally has meant
> zealous enforcement of alleged intellectual monopoly rights. Contracts
> should be enforced: agreements are made to be honoured. That doesn't need
> to be stated. Making a specific point calling for contractual compliance
> plays into the IPC and CSG positions; I'd suggest that it is
> counterproductive for the NCSG to specifically call for such action. The
> line in question:
>
> *ensuring contractual compliance of the Registry Agreement is key to this
> discussion as it enables a proper maintenance of what has been agreed
> between the parties. *
>
> The rest of the document is a good compromise between competing views in
> the NCSG on a variety of issues. I'm happy to support if the above line is
> removed. Otherwise count me as an abstain: strict contractual compliance,
> in ICANN-speak, is not something the NCSG should be calling for or
> supporting.
>
> Ed
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From*: "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
> *Sent*: Friday, May 26, 2017 11:44 AM
> *To*: "ncsg-pc" <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>, "Martin Pablo Silva Valent" <
> mpsilvavalent at gmail.com>, "Poncelet Ileleji" <pileleji at ymca.gm>, "Marilia
> Maciel" <mariliamaciel at gmail.com>, "Milan, Stefania" <
> Stefania.Milan at eui.eu>, "Ayden Férdeline" <icann at ferdeline.com>, "Matthew
> Shears" <matthew at intpolicy.com>, "Stephanie Perrin" <
> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>, "Edward Morris" <egmorris1 at toast.net>,
> "Juan Manuel Rojas" <jumaropi at yahoo.com>
> *Subject*: Re: Reminder Comment on GNSO Community Comment 2 (CC2) on New
> gTLD Subsequent Procedures
>
> Hi all,
>
> it is time to make a decision with regard to the CC2 comment
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/133uzvDQI__
> EmNGhqiDkHW0EvfvKOwLE9m7ozNIZUVNY/edit. please review it and send your
> vote. we need clear support here. if we can reach conclusion by Today
> 23:59UTC it will be good since we also have to submit the SO/AC
> accountability comment.
> @Avri did the staff start working on the comments report?
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2017-05-25 8:45 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>:
>>
>> hi all,
>>
>> we need to finish reviewing and finalizing the CC2 comment. the public
>> consultation ended this Monday, we don't have much time to extend. I
>> suggested previously Wednesday as the deadline but I only saw a comment
>> from Ayden in the NCSG list.
>>
>> I would like to ask all members of policy committee to review the draft
>> and then share their positions about endorsing it or not. for those who
>> make comments in the google doc, please suggest wording or new text, that
>> would be helpful to solve them.
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>> Date: 2017-05-22 9:01 GMT+09:00
>> Subject: Comment on GNSO Community Comment 2 (CC2) on New gTLD Subsequent
>> Procedures / Consultation and review
>> To: "NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu" <NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>,
>> ncsg-pc <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Bruna kindly volunteered and drafted this response to the Community
>> Comment consultation from the new gTLD subsequent procedures working group
>> for NCSG https://docs.google.com/document/d/133uzvDQI__EmNGhqiDkHW0Ev
>> fvKOwLE9m7ozNIZUVNY/edit. the details about the public consultation are
>> here https://www.icann.org/public-comments/cc2-new-gtld-subs
>> equent-procedures-2017-03-22-en.
>>
>> The deadline for submission is the 22nd May, so we have a short time to
>> do so. I think we can attempt a late submission and hopefully be accepted
>> by the working group. We should review, add comments, editing and be
>> tidying up the document in the next 3 days and submitting by this Wednesday
>> after endorsement by the policy committee. because of the time constraints,
>> please add wording and edits when you make comments.
>>
>> looking forward your participation and asking those who were involved in
>> the previous new gTLD policy discussion to jump in.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170526/7644045c/attachment.htm>