[NCSG-PC] Draft comment of CCNSO review deferral / Review&Endorsment

[Edward Morris]

Rafik, Matt, Ayden, all,
  
  
 I've put together an opposition comment for consideration for support, improvement and submission.
  
 I'm on the road and am having great difficulty uploading to Google docs. I've attached the comment to this e-mail as a Word doc. If someone could kindly upload this proposed comment to create a Google doc for editing purposes I'd be appreciative. A reminder that the deadline for submission is 23:59 UTC tonight.
  
 Thanks again to Arshad for all of his work on the comment.
  
 Kind Regards,
  
 Ed Morris
  
  
 Sent from my iPhone
  
  

----------------------------------------
 From: "Matthew Shears" <matthew at intpolicy.com>
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 10:46 AM
To: "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>, "Ayden Férdeline" <icann at ferdeline.com>
Cc: "ncsg-pc" <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>
Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Draft comment of CCNSO review deferral / Review&Endorsment   

Ed made some valuable comments on this in a recent e-mail that I cannot put my finger on at the moment.    On 19/05/2017 11:11, Rafik Dammak wrote:
  Hi Ayden,  
 If we have overwhelming support for opposing the deferral, we would need a new comment. Anyone wants to volunteer for the drafting?
  
 Best.
  
 Rafik 
     On May 19, 2017 5:51 PM, "Ayden Férdeline" <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:    Hi,
  
 My initial reaction is, I do not support the postponement of mandatory Reviews. If there is a compelling reason for why this should happen, I would be interested in hearing it.

Many thanks,

  
   Ayden  

  

   
  -------- Original Message --------
 Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft comment of CCNSO review deferral / Review&Endorsment
 Local Time: May 19, 2017 12:52 AM
 UTC Time: May 18, 2017 11:52 PM
 From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com
 To: ncsg-pc <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>
  
  Hi all,
  
 I am sharing here the draft made by Arshad about ccNSO review deferral  https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZZOFEBt1xbRblheuIvBdSXxFqXiEBiesFflka6Rtk7I/edit?usp=sharing. 
  
 I understand that Ed objected to the content and explained his point of view on NCSG mailing list https://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=NCSG-DISCUSS;9ee80ad7.1705 .
  
 I need to hear from others about their positions and also any suggestion on how to accommodate the 2 opposite views in the NCSG comment i.e what can be the consensual position for NCSG here.
  
 the deadline for submission is also the 19th May and so we have less than 24hours to review and suggest a way to move forward.
  
 Best,
  
 Rafik
  
  ---------- Forwarded message ----------
  From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
 Date: 2017-05-17 11:38 GMT+09:00
 Subject: Draft comment of CCNSO review deferral / Consultation
 To: "NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu" <NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>, ncsg-pc <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>
  
  
  Hi all,
  
 Arshad kindly drafted and shared his draft for NCSG comment https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZZOFEBt1xbRblheuIvBdSXxFqXiEBiesFflka6Rtk7I/edit?usp=sharing. 
  
 Please review it, add your comments, express your support or not in order to assess what we have the common NCSG position on this topics and submitting in time. the deadline for submission is this Friday 19th May.
  
 Best.
  
 Rafik

   

   
 	 		 				 Virus-free. www.avg.com	  		

        

 _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc      

 --  Matthew Shears matthew at intpolicy.com +447712472987 Skype:mshears 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170519/6297005f/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ccNSO.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 143645 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170519/6297005f/attachment.docx>