[NCSG-PC] Proposed comments on BGC Changes - new link
Edward Morris
egmorris1 at toast.net
Tue May 9 21:33:48 EEST 2017
Hi,
Thanks to those who have worked on this comment. The revisions have
addressed my principle concerns and if folks want to go forward with this
I'm happy to endorse.
That said, I do believe the Board should have waited until all of the new
accountability mechanisms were operational before proposing any changes to
how they processed them. A look at the number of reconsideration requests
filed yields the following data:
2013 -23 requests
2014- 46 requests
2015- 15 requests
2016- 14 requests
2017 (4 months) - 1 request
In the 6 months since the new Bylaws went into effect there have been 2
reconsideration requests.
Although I'm not sure the change is needed, and personally believe that
the way the accountability mechanisms are designed reconsideration will be
a sadly underutilized mechanism going forward, I do think the community
should give the Board great leeway in designing its operations. If the
Board wants to do things this way, I see no major negative impact to the
community going forward so we should allow it to proceed. Indeed, given the
poor success rate for complainants under the current rules, changing
committee composition and structure can only help.
Ed
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170509/486dbb9f/attachment.htm>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list