[NCSG-PC] RDS PDP WG Poll - Response Coordination

Ayden Férdeline icann at ferdeline.com
Mon Jul 17 00:10:09 EEST 2017


Unfortunately I do not think an extension would be granted. It was my perception that the very small response window for this poll was intentional. However, this was not a poll which required a formal NCSG response. The leadership team of the RDS PDP WG put out a 'wish list' of 39 data elements for a future RDS. The aim of this poll, as best I understand it, was to put something concrete on the table and to allow WG members to provide input on whether they agree or disagree with that data element. These polls are supposedly informal but their results seem (to me) to be treated as gospel by the WG. As a result, I was keen to see a number of NCSG members respond to the poll in their personal capacity with public interest-orientated responses, and from what I understand, that has happened. I hope this sheds a bit more light on my original email to this list.

- Ayden

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] RDS PDP WG Poll - Response Coordination
> Local Time: July 16, 2017 9:09 PM
> UTC Time: July 16, 2017 8:09 PM
> From: matthew at intpolicy.com
> To: ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is
>
> I confess I am a little lost in this process. The deadline is passed - can we seek an extension.
>
> On 14/07/2017 20:18, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>
>> Hi Wendy,
>> No, this is an activity unrelated to our work on GDPR compliance, and is intended to help us respond to a poll currently being circulated to members of the GSNO working group (RDS PDP). Thanks.
>> Best wishes, Ayden
>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] RDS PDP WG Poll - Response Coordination
>>> Local Time: July 14, 2017 8:15 PM
>>> UTC Time: July 14, 2017 7:15 PM
>>> From: wendy at seltzer.com
>>> To: Ayden Férdeline [<icann at ferdeline.com>](mailto:icann at ferdeline.com), ncsg-pc [<ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>](mailto:ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is)
>>> On 07/13/2017 10:19 AM, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> As a part of the Next Generation Registration Directory Service to Replace WHOIS Policy Development Process Working Group (RDS PDP WG), members have been asked to respond to a lengthy 40-question poll and to provide thoughtful rationale for and against potential data elements which go beyond those included in the tentative minimum public data set.
>>>>
>>>> Here is a link to a handout that was recently circulated which contains information about each of the proposed data elements: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66086729/28JunePoll-DataElements-ExpandedHandout.pdf
>>>>
>>>> The deadline for responding to this poll in our personal capacity is this Saturday, 15 July. The poll results will be used to inform deliberation during our WG call on 18 July.
>>>>
>>>> I suggested on our PC call earlier this week that we should coordinate our response here and, as best we can, present a united front on which data elements we support and which we do not. Of course this is only a suggested path forward and WG members are free to respond to the poll as they wish. But if you would like to join me in developing a common position, I have created a Google Doc for us to use and encourage all RDS PDP WG members to help craft our position.
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tsGTBf5P5dqDzdgGwVrYxHJQF9aKo7DQU55Tm4q9H_M/edit?usp=sharinghttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1tsGTBf5P5dqDzdgGwVrYxHJQF9aKo7DQU55Tm4q9H_M/edit?usp=sharing
>>>> I warmly welcome your input — please log into your Google account before responding (or add your name to the end of your comment) in case clarification is required. Thank you.
>>> Hi Ayden,
>>> Is this meant to be responsive to the group"s request for "user stories"
>>> and the data elements they require?
>>> --Wendy
>>>> Best wishes,
>>>> Ayden Férdeline
>>>> [linkedin.com/in/ferdeline](https://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org +1 617.863.0613
>>> Strategy Lead, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
>>> Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
>>> https://wendy.seltzer.org/
>>> https://www.lumendatabase.org/
>>> https://www.torproject.org/
>>
>> http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient	Virus-free. [www.avg.com](http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient)
>> #DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
> --
> Matthew Shears
> matthew at intpolicy.com
> +447712472987
> Skype:mshears
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170716/ad35fbb9/attachment.htm>


More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list