[NCSG-PC] RDS PDP WG Poll - Response Coordination

Matthew Shears matthew at intpolicy.com
Sun Jul 16 23:09:53 EEST 2017


I confess I am a little lost in this process.  The deadline is passed - 
can we seek an extension.


On 14/07/2017 20:18, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
> Hi Wendy,
>
> No, this is an activity unrelated to our work on GDPR compliance, and 
> is intended to help us respond to a poll currently being circulated to 
> members of the GSNO working group (RDS PDP). Thanks.
>
> Best wishes, Ayden
>
>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] RDS PDP WG Poll - Response Coordination
>> Local Time: July 14, 2017 8:15 PM
>> UTC Time: July 14, 2017 7:15 PM
>> From: wendy at seltzer.com
>> To: Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>, ncsg-pc 
>> <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>
>>
>> On 07/13/2017 10:19 AM, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > As a part of the Next Generation Registration Directory Service to 
>> Replace WHOIS Policy Development Process Working Group (RDS PDP WG), 
>> members have been asked to respond to a lengthy 40-question poll and 
>> to provide thoughtful rationale for and against potential data 
>> elements which go beyond those included in the tentative minimum 
>> public data set.
>> >
>> > Here is a link to a handout that was recently circulated which 
>> contains information about each of the proposed data elements: 
>> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66086729/28JunePoll-DataElements-ExpandedHandout.pdf
>> >
>> > The deadline for responding to this poll in our personal capacity 
>> is this Saturday, 15 July. The poll results will be used to inform 
>> deliberation during our WG call on 18 July.
>> >
>> > I suggested on our PC call earlier this week that we should 
>> coordinate our response here and, as best we can, present a united 
>> front on which data elements we support and which we do not. Of 
>> course this is only a suggested path forward and WG members are free 
>> to respond to the poll as they wish. But if you would like to join me 
>> in developing a common position, I have created a Google Doc for us 
>> to use and encourage all RDS PDP WG members to help craft our position.
>> > 
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tsGTBf5P5dqDzdgGwVrYxHJQF9aKo7DQU55Tm4q9H_M/edit?usp=sharinghttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1tsGTBf5P5dqDzdgGwVrYxHJQF9aKo7DQU55Tm4q9H_M/edit?usp=sharing
>> > I warmly welcome your input — please log into your Google account 
>> before responding (or add your name to the end of your comment) in 
>> case clarification is required. Thank you.
>>
>> Hi Ayden,
>>
>> Is this meant to be responsive to the group"s request for "user stories"
>> and the data elements they require?
>>
>> --Wendy
>>
>> > Best wishes,
>> > Ayden Férdeline
>> > [linkedin.com/in/ferdeline](https://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > NCSG-PC mailing list
>> > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>> >
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org +1 617.863.0613
>> Strategy Lead, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
>> Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
>> https://wendy.seltzer.org/
>> https://www.lumendatabase.org/
>> https://www.torproject.org/
>
>
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 
> 	Virus-free. www.avg.com 
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 
>
>
> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc

-- 
Matthew Shears
matthew at intpolicy.com
+447712472987
Skype:mshears

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170716/64030972/attachment.htm>


More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list