[NCSG-PC] Fwd: FW: [Soac-leaders-icann58] Alternative HIT - Data Protection Commissioners

Wed Jan 25 11:38:18 EET 2017

Sounds excellent Stephanie - well done


On 25/01/2017 08:21, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>
> Thanks to everyone who helped with this.  We are back to the HIT idea, 
> many thanks to the GNSO and Chuck Gomes for support.  I am here at 
> CPDP with Peter Kimpian, we will be working on the outline for the HIT 
> and hope to confirm potential speakers on site.  Please do not drop 
> the NCSG slot we have obtained, we need to brainstorm a bit aobut 
> exactly what we use it for, probably to elaborate on details but it 
> will depend on who comes.  I am going to propose we try hard to get 
> the winner of the Champion of Freedom award to come, (to be announced 
> at 6 pm tonight).
>
> cheers Steph
>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: 	FW: [Soac-leaders-icann58] Alternative HIT - Data Protection 
> Commissioners
> Date: 	Wed, 25 Jan 2017 01:37:18 +0000
> From: 	James M. Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com>
> To: 	Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>, KIMPIAN 
> Peter <Peter.KIMPIAN at coe.int>, kathy at kathykleiman.com 
> <kathy at kathykleiman.com>
> CC: 	Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>, Austin, Donna 
> <Donna.Austin at neustar.biz>, Heather Forrest <haforrestesq at gmail.com>, 
> Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
>
>
>
> Stephanie / Peter –
>
> Please see thread below.  We have tentatively agreed to move the Data 
> Commissioner “Summit” (need a better name) to a High Interest Topic 
> (HIT) session at ICANN58 in Copenhagen.
>
> Next Steps – We will get your team of volunteers (and anyone else you 
> determine is necessary) in touch with the meeting planning staff.  In 
> the interim, please put together a format & rough agenda for the 
> session, along with a tentative list of Data Commissioners who plan to 
> attend.
>
> There’s still much to be done, but I think we’re headed in the right 
> direction with this.
>
>
> Thanks—
>
> J.
>
> *From: *<soac-leaders-icann58-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of "James 
> M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 17:33
> *To: *"Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch" 
> <Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch>, "soac-leaders-icann58 at icann.org" 
> <soac-leaders-icann58 at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Soac-leaders-icann58] Alternative HIT - Data 
> Protection Commissioners
>
> Thank you, Thomas, and others who contributed their thoughts.
>
> As indicated in the original message, I will ask the volunteers to 
> develop and present an agenda for this session, and include a list of 
> committed attendees (if available).  We will then work with Nick and 
> Tanzi to get this added as an HIT.
>
> Many thanks—
>
> J.
>
> *From: *"Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch" 
> <Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch>
> *Date: *Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 00:41
> *To: *"James M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com>, 
> "soac-leaders-icann58 at icann.org" <soac-leaders-icann58 at icann.org>
> *Subject: *AW: [Soac-leaders-icann58] Alternative HIT - Data 
> Protection Commissioners
>
> Dear all
>
> First of all, i would like to thank James for his message below.
>
> Then I would like to tell you that – given that this initiative to 
> have a dialogue between the domain industry and data protection 
> commissioners from Europe and other regions has been taken by the 
> Council of Europe who is a GAC observer and that there seems to be 
> widespread interest in having such a dialogue in Copenhagen – the GAC 
> leadership has proposed the GAC to act as a “sponsor” or “facilitator” 
> of such a dialogue.
>
> While there is support to have such a dialogue, some GAC members 
> raised some questions and concerns regard the formalities about the 
> “sponsoring” or “facilitating” role of the GAC on this. I have now 
> replied to them that in the end, I think these formal issues are less 
> important. What is important is that, given the interest signalled 
> from various parts of the ICANN community, we DO actually have such a 
> dialogue.
>
> Whether we deal with it as a HIT or we call it differently, is not 
> really important to me. So if the GNSO is ready to act as a formal 
> “driver” of this, I would not have any problem with this. Again, the 
> important thing is that we move forward and find a time in the 
> Copenhagen schedule to have this dialogue as I am convinced that this 
> would help solve problems and avoid future problems with regard to 
> incompatibilities between frameworks developed in ICANN and national 
> or international data protection legislation…
>
> Best regards
>
> Thomas
>
> *Von:*soac-leaders-icann58-bounces at icann.org 
> [mailto:soac-leaders-icann58-bounces at icann.org] *Im Auftrag von *James 
> M. Bladel
> *Gesendet:* Montag, 23. Januar 2017 21:54
> *An:* SOAC Leaders ICANN58 <soac-leaders-icann58 at icann.org>
> *Betreff:* [Soac-leaders-icann58] Alternative HIT - Data Protection 
> Commissioners
>
> Dear SOAC Leaders / ICANN58 Planning Team –
>
> During the GNSO Council last week, there was discussion of a session 
> at ICANN58 that would address data protection concerns in our 
> industry, and would be attended by data protection commissioners from 
> throughout the EU.  These folks are especially interested in the 
> ongoing work around WHOIS/RDS, and the Copenhagen location is easily 
> accessible to prospective attendees.
>
> Organizers of this session have asked the GNSO and other groups (GAC, 
> I believe?) to support their inclusion on the meeting agenda.  
> Additionally, as it appears that one of the HIT sessions may become 
> available (Monday 1515-1645), I would like to propose that we consider 
> repurposing this HIT slot to accommodate the growing interest in the 
> “Data Protection Summit”.
>
> If there is support among this group for proceeding, then I would ask 
> the volunteer organizers of this session to produce an overview/agenda 
> of their session, to ensure that the subject matter and format meets 
> the expectations of all SO/ACs, and contributes to the furtherance of 
> the RDS policy work already underway.  I recognize that this is coming 
> fairly late in to the process, but am hopeful that our group can be 
> flexible in its consideration of this request.  If we are unable to 
> accommodate the proposal, please note that some version of this 
> session will likely occur in Copenhagen anyway, albeit it would not 
> enjoy an unconflicted HIT slot on the main schedule.
>
> If possible, we should decide this week, so I can task the volunteers 
> to either (a) develop the aforementioned session agenda, or (b) make 
> alternative (non-HIT) scheduling arrangements.
>
> Thank you,
>
> J.
>
> ----------------
>
> James Bladel
>
> GNSO Chair
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc

-- 
------------
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 771 2472987

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170125/4927c5d3/attachment.htm>