[NCSG-PC] Board member election process and timeline

[Edward Morris]

I'm fine with the proposed schedule. I don't know why we need more than two days of interviews (one per SG) and creating a special Council meeting on May 3rd may run into attendance problems as that's a popular holiday week, at least in Europe, due to the May Day holiday. We have several potential rounds of voting so there should be sufficient time to reach a final decision.

That said, this is the first time I've participated in this process so am happy to go along with what others feel appropriate. The most important thing, in my view, is just to settle on a plan and timetable, whatever it may be.

Ed

Sent from my iPhone

> On 14 Feb 2017, at 18:58, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:
> 
> My preference would be for a special meeting of the GNSO Council, which would potentially give us another two weeks to use as part of the candidate selection process. However, I realise this would be a burden on all of the GNSO Councillors. 
> 
> In any case, two days is not realistic for interviewing all of the candidates.
> 
> Ayden Férdeline
> linkedin.com/in/ferdeline
> 
> 
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [NCSG-PC] Board member election process and timeline
>> Local Time: 14 February 2017 6:46 PM
>> UTC Time: 14 February 2017 18:46
>> From: ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info
>> To: ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is
>> 
>> Dear PC members,
>> 
>> As I hope everyone is already aware, we need to agree with CSG on the
>> timeline and process for NCPH Board member election.
>> 
>> We had a session today about it here in Reykjavík without conclusion,
>> but it really needs to be decided within a few days.
>> 
>> I'll attach the latest staff proposal. As things stand the only thing
>> there almost everybody agrees should be changed is the interview time:
>> two days is too short to ensure all candidates can be interviewed.
>> Otherwise feeling is that it doesn't really matter much - we can do it
>> in the time we have.
>> 
>> I will note that the 10 April deadline there isn't stonehard, it is
>> possible to have an extra council meeting even on 3 May if need be to
>> get two extra weeks, but it would obviously not be particularly desirable.
>> 
>> Comments welcome. While we can't decide this alone, we can decide
>> what we can accept and then people here can work it out with CSG.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Tapani Tarvainen
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170215/fc6b1f75/attachment.htm>