[NCSG-PC] GNSO Outreach

[farzaneh badii]

Maryam just sent me the blocked schedule and it seems like Saturday, GNSO
council is gonna have sessions all day!!!! which makes my suggestion
absolutely pointless.  I will talk to Heather about this. We can't afford a
three hour session at all on Saturday. I find it bizarre that GNSO has all
day PDP meeting in parallel to outreach.

I have on Sunday NCSG in-reach session which newcomers from civil society
are welcome to join and see what we do at NCSG. I probably leave it at that.

Farzaneh

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Dr. Tatiana Tropina <t.tropina at mpicc.de>
wrote:

> I am of two minds about this,
>
> while I certainly agree with Ayden's arguments -- I think we might give it
> a go and see how it turns out.  Many of those attending our outreach still
> don't understand that we are a part of GNSO, what GNSO is doing, how do we
> participate in the dynamics -- so we always still show only a piece of the
> puzzle. This does create confusion especially for the newcomers -- to show
> what policy is about we might want to show what GNSO is doing as a whole,
> what the SGs and houses are, why are we a part of it, how it is connected
> to the fact that we have a narrow mission, how we fit a bigger picture.
>
> So I would be in favour to give it a go. I remember before our experiment
> in Copenhagen with Euralo there were also arguments that we are sharing the
> prime time, but it worked well. We won't know until we try.
>
> However, back to Ayden's arguments - if it's less than 2,5 - 3 hours
> outreach, I would rather be a bit skeptic.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tanya
>
>
>
> On 11/12/17 19:18, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My initial reaction is: I prefer doing our outreach as a stakeholder
> group; it gives us a full 90 minutes or so to emphasise our values and to
> shine to newcomers. If we do it as the GNSO, we are sharing the spotlight,
> have a reduced amount of time, and might have to watch our words,
> particularly on issues where we do not have a common position. We could get
> into a situation where we have to be on the defense? Plus, in reality, we
> do exist in silos...
>
> However I look forward to hearing what others think on this issue.
>
> Ayden
>
> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 05:02, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Dear PC
>
> I thought it might be better to do an outreach as GNSO in ICANN 61, saves
> us the clash with GNSO council meetings and shows people the dynamics of
> the group instead of making them understand GNSO in silos.
>
> What do you think? Heather is in favor of it and I will have to talk CPH
> into it.
>
> Best
>
>
>
> Farzaneh
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20171211/e9ea5076/attachment.htm>