[NCSG-PC] Fwd: [RDS-WHOIS2-RT] Replacement and Removal of Members

[Ayden Férdeline]

I would like to know who asked Alan to do this, too.

I'm still wondering why Judith collected the applications for the tribal fellowship programme, too - why was this not done by ICANN staff? Seems members of ALAC are taking on some interesting new responsibilities.

I disagree with the proposed procedure. I think it is one thing for the SO/AC to withdraw their endorsement of their nominee, but QUITE another for Review Team members to band together and demand someone resign simply because they are "disruptive". What an ambiguous term. That to me is wholly inappropriate.

Best wishes, Ayden

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [RDS-WHOIS2-RT] Replacement and Removal of Members
> Local Time: 27 August 2017 2:02 PM
> UTC Time: 27 August 2017 13:02
> From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
> To: ncsg-pc <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>
>
> This seems important enough to warrant consideration by PC.  What do you think?  iS it normal for a REview team to figure out how to remove people?
>
> I dont actually remember anyone asking Alan to figure this out.
>
> cheers SP
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject:	[RDS-WHOIS2-RT] Replacement and Removal of Members
> Date:	Sat, 26 Aug 2017 22:51:59 -0400
> From:	Alan Greenberg [<alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>](mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca)
>
> To:	RDS-WHOIS2-RT [<rds-whois2-rt at icann.org>](mailto:rds-whois2-rt at icann.org)
>
> I was asked to propose wording for the section of the Terms of
> Reference on Replacement and Removal of Members
>
> I would like to propose the following wording for the consideration of the RT.
>
> Alan
>
> =======
>
> If a Review Team member is no longer able or willing to serve, or if
> an SO/AC withdraws its endorsement of the member, the SO/AC making
> the original endorsement will be requested to refill the position
> with a replacement member. The SO/AC will make the selection
> according to their own processes and will not be bound to consider
> only those candidates who originally applied requesting their endorsement.
>
> If a Review Team member is sufficiently inactive or disruptive as to
> cause at least 50% of Review Team members (excluding the member in
> question) to request their removal, the member will be asked to
> resign. If the member fails to resign, the SO/AC that endorsed the
> member will be requested to withdraw their endorsement and replace
> the member. Should the SO/AC not take action, the member can be
> removed by a 2/3 majority vote of the remaining Review Team members.
> In all cases, the balloting will be carried out in such a way as to
> not reveal how individual members voted.
>
> _______________________________________________
> RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list
> RDS-WHOIS2-RT at icann.org
>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170827/176d0e91/attachment.htm>