[NCSG-PC] CCWG-IG motion amendments

[Stephanie Perrin]

There is a typo in the thrid para, amtrying to get edit access to fix a 
few things. More important question is exactly what model did we have in 
mind, if not a CCWG???

cheers Steph


On 2017-08-09 20:31, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> are you ok with the proposed amendments 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LQWVaEgppF38Gvnm9SpvftHpdhI1BOGdRdl_YyBe3oA/edit? 
> we should submit them by the deadline Monday 14th August to be taken 
> into account.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2017-07-14 8:32 GMT+09:00 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com 
> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>:
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     as you know, we asked for the CCWG-IG motion to be deferred so we
>     can continue working on our amendments. that was supported by
>     other groups like IPC due to the short time we had since
>     Johannesburg meeting.
>
>     Marilia, Farzaneh and I worked on making some amendments to the
>     motion as follow-up of our NCSG Policy call this week
>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LQWVaEgppF38Gvnm9SpvftHpdhI1BOGdRdl_YyBe3oA/edit
>     <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LQWVaEgppF38Gvnm9SpvftHpdhI1BOGdRdl_YyBe3oA/edit>
>
>     we are sharing this so we can discuss them. we will also share
>     them with the wider NCSG list.
>
>     Best,
>
>     Rafik
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170809/e118d67a/attachment.htm>