[NCSG-PC] Fw: Re: Sessions in Johannesburg?

Tue Apr 25 22:35:36 EEST 2017

Martin,  I think these can be  NCSG meetings which include both NCUC and
NPOC. we should say in the description of the meeting that NCSG, as well as
its constituencies, will hold these meetings but strictly talk about policy
and what at the NCSG level we are working on. Based on each day GNSO
program I think we could brief the attendees on the issues and our
strategies to tackle the issue and also brief them on how we come up with
policies.

Farzaneh

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Martin Pablo Silva Valent <
mpsilvavalent at gmail.com> wrote:

> Maybe NPOC can pitch in the outreach session as well, Poncelet can maybe
> bring that idea back if we decide to merge NCSG session with NCUC, after
> all they share some common audience.
>
> Martin
>
> On Apr 25, 2017, at 4:11 PM, Matthew Shears <matthew at intpolicy.com> wrote:
>
> I support this approach - thanks!
>
> On 25/04/2017 21:04, farzaneh badii wrote:
>
> Hi Kathy, all,
>
> Actually  it might make more sense to have NCSG meetings and not have
> separate NCUC meetings. Because from the schedule I see, we cannot possibly
> have meetings that do not conflict.
>
> I think Tapani wanted the slots for Outreach policy practice in the
> morning. which starts at 8.00 AM. If we can have 1 hour of those every day
> and prepare people for the rest of the day that would be good. We might
> have to just do 30 minutes lunch breaks (as instructed by the planning
> team) to either strategize for the afternoon or meet with other groups.
>
> I talked to EC members and they don't mind merging with NCSG. I might
> reserve a 30 minutes lunch break for an informal meeting with some of the
> board memebers but other than that I think we will be ok if NCSG can submit
> :
>
> One hour morning sessions (outreach and policy strategy)
>
> 30 minutes during lunch breaks
>
> If Tapani and the rest agree with that I will not ask for separate time
> slots for NCUC.
>
>
> Farzaneh
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Observer too to Farzi's important suggestion -- with follow-up.
>>
>> Quick thought that we might want to have a longer NCUC/NCSG prep meeting
>> (for all NCSG attendees) early on in the meeting. It would be good to have
>> an arc of all the issues in Jo'burg we should be thinking about -- and give
>> people some time to think, research and read for a day before jumping into
>> a WG discussion.
>>
>> - So 30 minute AM meetings for the daily briefing
>>
>> - Occasional lunch sessions, including one with Board members
>>
>> - An initial hour meeting at the very start (Monday AM?) to provide an
>> arc of the issues we need to work on together in this meeting.
>>
>> Best, Kathy
>>
>> On 4/25/2017 2:19 PM, farzaneh badii wrote:
>>
>> Hello PC
>>
>> Observer here: for NCUC, not to make a very busy schedule
>> unnecessarily busier, I will send requests for 30 minutes morning sessions
>> and 45 minutes lunch break sessions. Since I will not be there I would like
>> some of the NCUC members on NCSG PC members to lead the discussions and
>> prepare our members for each day. We might also arrange a 45 minutes board
>> meeting for NCUC during a lunch break.Please keep this in mind before
>> submitting your requests, we don't want to have schedule conflicts with
>> NCSG. If you want to also have similar half an hour morning sessions on
>> policy strategy and outreach, let me know perhaps just joining NCSG meeting
>> in the morning is wiser.
>>
>> Farzaneh
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Tapani Tarvainen <
>> ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm fine with an extra PC session - at least we can ask.
>>>
>>> Could somebody come up with a title and description for it?
>>>
>>> Deadline is tomorrow, and I'll be traveling most of the day,
>>> like today (now in train) - I'll finalize this tomorrow evening.
>>>
>>> Tapani
>>>
>>> On Apr 25 17:59, Rafik Dammak (rafik.dammak at gmail.com) wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi Ayden,
>>> >
>>> > yes, we can do that. It is at the end a policy forum so discussing the
>>> > scheduled topics and sessions, and planning response to public
>>> comments and
>>> > positions makes sense.
>>> > I assume that should be on the last day so can we have it as kind of
>>> > wrap-up session.
>>> > Best,
>>> >
>>> > Rafik
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2017-04-25 17:21 GMT+09:00 Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>:
>>> >
>>> > > Resending this, as the PC list dropped off inadvertently.
>>> > >
>>> > > - Ayden
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > -------- Original Message --------
>>> > > Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Sessions in Johannesburg?
>>> > > Local Time: 25 April 2017 9:20 AM
>>> > > UTC Time: 25 April 2017 08:20
>>> > > From: icann at ferdeline.com
>>> > > To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>> > >
>>> > > Hi,
>>> > >
>>> > > While I am open to meeting with other groups if time permits, I am
>>> > > wondering if it might be more useful having two PC meetings --- one
>>> of
>>> > > which could be solely for discussing upcoming public comments,
>>> allocating
>>> > > them, and formulating our positions?
>>> > >
>>> > > Best wishes,
>>> > >
>>> > > Ayden
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>>
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> Virus-free.
> www.avg.com
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
> --
> Matthew Shearsmatthew at intpolicy.com+447712472987 <+44%207712%20472987>Skype:mshears
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170425/9d8e88d1/attachment.htm>